Plummer v. Hollis
| Decision Date | 24 November 1937 |
| Docket Number | 26884. |
| Citation | 11 N.E.2d 140,213 Ind. 43 |
| Parties | PLUMMER et al. v. HOLLIS. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, St. Joseph County; J. Fred bingham, judge.
Walter R. Arnold and John Degnan, both of South Bend, for appellants.
Oril Parker, of South Bend, for appellee.
Appellants filed their complaint against appellee, alleging that they had employed appellee, an undertaker, to prepare for burial, and to bury, their two year and eight month old daughter; that, as part of the contract of employment, for which they compensated the defendant, the defendant undertook and agreed to have a photograph made of the deceased daughter before burial; that the defendant had knowledge that the plaintiffs had no picture, photograph, or likeness of their deceased daughter, and had knowledge of the purpose of the plaintiffs in having the photograph made, and knew that they were anxious to have the photograph for preservation; that the defendant carelessly and negligently allowed the body of the deceased daughter to be buried without the photograph being made, whereby the plaintiffs suffered great psychic distress and mental anguish, to their damage in the sum of $500. A demurrer to this complaint was sustained. The plaintiffs refused to plead further, and there was judgment for the defendant. The sustaining of the demurrer is the error assigned.
The sole question is whether an action can be maintained for damages for mental anguish alone, resulting from the negligent breach of a contract. The question is answered in the negative in Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ferguson (1901) 157 Ind. 64, 60 N.E. 674, 1080, 54 L.R.A. 846, since which the question has been considered settled in this state. Appellants rely upon Renihan et al. v. Wright et al. (1890) 125 Ind. 536, 25 N.E. 822, 9 L.R.A. 514, 21 Am.St.Rep. 249. As pointed out by Jordan, J., in a dissenting opinion in the Western Union Telegraph Co. Case, the majority opinion necessarily resulted in overruling Renihan et al. v. Wright et al., supra.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rubin v. Matthews Intern. Corp.
...Mary's Church Soc., 18 Mass.App.Ct. 186, 464 N.E.2d 956 (1984); Lamm v. Shingleton, 231 N.C. 10, 55 S.E.2d 810; cf. Plummer v. Hollis, 213 Ind. 43, 11 N.E.2d 140 (1937) (no recovery for mental distress from breach of contract to have photo made of deceased daughter before burial). Because t......
-
Grubbs v. United States
...which constitute mental suffering naturally resulting from personal injuries, may be considered in estimating damages. Plummer v. Hollis, 213 Ind. 43, 11 N.E.2d 140 (1937); see 3 Notre Dame L. 246 (1928), Mental Anguish as Element of Damages; see also, 54 Ind.Law J. 467 G. In an appropriate......
-
Tacket v. General Motors Corp., IP 89-162 C.
...In Indiana, a plaintiff may not recover mental anguish damages that flow from a negligent breach of contract. Plummer v. Hollis, 213 Ind. 43, 11 N.E.2d 140 (1937). This policy is The authorities cited upon the argument leave no doubt in my mind that the amount of damages to be awarded for t......
-
Tucker v. Roman Catholic Diocese
...a pure breach of contract theory. Holloway v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc., 695 N.E.2d 991, 995 (Ind.Ct.App.1998) (citing Plummer v. Hollis, 213 Ind. 43, 11 N.E.2d 140 (Ind.1937)). The trial court properly dismissed Tucker's contract action with prejudice. II. Promissory Estoppel In Count II of he......