Plunkett v. Bd. of Pension Comm'rs of City of Hoboken, N. J., 143.

• Decision Date: 10 January 1935
• Docket Number: No. 143.,143.
• Parties: Thomas P. PLUNKETT, Appellant v. BOARD OF PENSION COMMISSIONERS OF CITY OF HOBOKEN, N. J., Respondent.
• Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

176 A. 341

Thomas P. PLUNKETT, Appellant

v. BOARD OF PENSION COMMISSIONERS OF CITY OF HOBOKEN, N. J., Respondent.

No. 143.

Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey.

Jan. 10, 1935.

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Lum, Tamblyn & Fairlie and Charles E. McCraith, Jr., all of Newark, for appellant.

Horace L. Allen, of Hoboken, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher, in the Supreme Court, reported in 113 N. J. Law, 230, 173 A. 923.

For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, and PERSKIE, and Judges VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, and WELLS—12.

For reversal: None.