Podea v. Acheson, 100
Decision Date | 10 January 1950 |
Docket Number | Docket 21475.,No. 100,100 |
Citation | 179 F.2d 306 |
Parties | PODEA v. ACHESON, Secretary of State of United States. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
John W. Burke, Jr., New York City, attorney for Titus Livius Podea, Plaintiff-Appellant; Ralph C. Busser, Philadelphia, Pa., and William T. Love, Jr., New York City, Counsel.
J. Vincent Keogh, United States Attorney, Brooklyn, N. Y., for Dean Acheson, as Secretary of State of the United States of America, Defendant-Appellee; Nathan Borock, Assistant United States Attorney, Brooklyn, N. Y., Counsel.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
The plaintiff brought this action under Section 503 of the Nationality Act of 1940, which provides as follows:
54 Stat. 1171, 8 U.S. C.A. § 903.
The trial judge dismissed the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff, though born a citizen of the United States, voluntarily expatriated himself and for that reason was not entitled to the judgment which he seeks, under Section 503, supra, declaring him to be a citizen. We hold that the decision that he voluntarily expatriated himself was erroneous and that the judgment must, therefore, be reversed.
Section 401 of the Nationality Act of 1940 further provided as follows:
"§ 401. A person who is a national of the United States, whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by:
* * * * * *
(b) Taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state; or
"(c) Entering, or serving in, the armed forces of a foreign state unless expressly authorized by the laws of the United States, if he has or acquires the nationality of such foreign state; * * *." 54 Stat. 1168, 1169, 8 U.S.C.A. § 801.
The Nationality Act first went into effect January 13, 1941, but the Act of 1907 was in effect during most of the time embraced in the case at bar.
It was provided in Chapter 2534 of the Act of 1907, 34 Stat. 1228:
The provisions of the Nationality Act which we have quoted above were in part reenactments of the Act of 1907 which we have referred to.
The question before us is whether Podea, a native-born citizen of the United States, expatriated himself by reason of his conscription into a foreign army and consequent taking of an oath of allegiance to a foreign sovereign.
Podea was born in Youngstown, Ohio, on September 12, 1912. His parents had emigrated to America from Austria-Hungary but had remained citizens of that country. In 1921 they returned to the Province of Transylvania in Roumania, the place of their origin, and brought their son with them. While in Ohio he attended the Youngstown public schools and on his removal to Roumania with his parents went to a high school there and later graduated from the University of Cluj. In 1934 he was ordered by the Roumanian military authorities to appear for registration. After registration he received a two years deferment of induction on the ground that he wished to finish his studies. In July 1931 he applied to the American Consul at Bucharest for a passport to the United States, took the oath of allegiance, stated in his application that since July 1921 he had temporarily resided in Roumania for the purpose of obtaining an education but intended to return to the United States within one year and a half to live there permanently. At the time of this application he had already been registered by the Roumanian...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
US v. Schiffer
......Contemporary standards of review under Vance v. Terrazas, 444 U.S. 252, 831 F. Supp. 1172 100 S.Ct. 540, 62 L.Ed.2d 461 (1980), establish an administrative presumption of intent to retain ...Dulles, 233 F.2d 551, 555 (3d Cir.1956); Lehmann v. Acheson, 206 F.2d 592, 594-95 (3d Cir.1953). A claim of involuntariness or duress is an affirmative ...For example, in Podea v. Acheson, 179 F.2d 306 (2d Cir.1950), the 831 F. Supp. 1188 plaintiff, a native-born American ......
-
Hansen v. Harris
...well-established in this Circuit. See Corniel-Rodriguez, supra; Miller v. United States, 500 F.2d 1007 (2d Cir. 1974); Podea v. Acheson, 179 F.2d 306 (2d Cir. 1950) (conclusion that plaintiff's waiver of citizenship was not binding for reason of duress supported by erroneous nature of Gover......
-
MATTER OF NATURALIZATION OF 68 FILIPINO WAR VETS.
...or unnecessary delay by Government officials in enabling alien to comply with condition of citizenship; dicta), and Podea v. Acheson, 179 F.2d 306 (2 Cir. 1950) (erroneous advice by State Department). More recently, the Court of Appeals for this Circuit distinguished Hibi on the grounds tha......
-
Dong Sik Kwon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
...estoppel in cases of this nature. Id. (414 U.S.) at 8, 94 S.Ct. 19 (at 21, 38 L.Ed.2d 7). Montana refers the reader to Podea v. Acheson, 179 F.2d 306 (2d Cir. 1950), and Lee You Fee v. Dulles, 236 F.2d 885, 887 (7th Cir. 1956).In Podea, a United States citizen living in Romania asked the Am......