Polizzi v. Trist
| Decision Date | 04 June 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 1033,1033 |
| Citation | 154 So.2d 84 |
| Parties | Joseph POLIZZI v. Nicholas TRIST, Sheriff. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Zelden & Zelden, Sam Monk Zelden, Bruce Borrello, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.
Tapper, Schuler & Perez, Elmer R. Tapper, Arabia, for defendant-appellee.
Before REGAN, YARRUT and HALL, JJ.
This is an appeal by Plaintiff from a judgment dismissing his suit against Defendant, individually and as Sheriff of St. Bernard Parish, on Defendant's exceptions of no right or cause of action. The District Judge gave no reasons for maintaining the exceptions and dismissing the suit.
The petition alleges that while Plaintiff was under arrest on charges brought against him in St. Bernard Parish, and while in the custody of the Sheriff's deputies being taken from New Orleans to Chalmette in St. Bernard Parish, to be incarcerated awaiting trial for a crime committed in St. Bernard; and while actually incarcerated in jail in St. Bernard, he was, without any cause or provocation, brutally beaten about the head, face, arms, legs, abdomen and groin, causing lacerations thereon and considerable suffering, for which he seeks damages against the Sheriff.
The basis for Defendant's exceptions of no right or cause of action is that the petition merely alleges that the deputy sheriffs were 'acting as agents' for Defendant, without stating that they were acting under his orders as deputy sheriffs to transport Plaintiff to jail in Chalmette. We think it is plain that the petition alleges that Plaintiff was, without any cause or provocation, brutally beaten while in the custody of Defendant's deputy sheriffs en route to Chalmette under criminal charges. The allegations of the petition must be taken as true on exceptions of no right or cause of action.
A sheriff is liable for the acts of his deputies committed in the course of their official duty, if the deputies have violated or failed to perform faithfully a duty required of them by law. If a deputy sheriff strikes a prisoner officially in his charge, when there was no need for it, his conduct in so doing would be a violation of an official duty, and malfeasance, for which the sheriff and his surety would be liable. These principles are well-established by the following cases: Jackson v. Steen, La.App., 92 So.2d 280; Robertson v. Palmer, La.App., 55 So.2d 68; Dufrene v. Rodrigue, La.App., 38 So.2d 511; Gray v. DeBretton, 192 La. 628, 188 So. 722.
For the above and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Williams v. United States
...Webb v. Zurich Ins. Co., 194 So.2d 436 (La.App.1966), reversed on other grounds, 251 La. 558, 205 So.2d 398 (1967); Polizzi v. Trist, 154 So.2d 84 (La.App.1961); Brown v. City of Shreveport, 129 So.2d 540 (La.App. 1961); Jackson v. Steen, 92 So.2d 280 (La.App.1957). Since Louisiana holds ja......
-
Foster v. Hampton
...at 725.4 For a more recent collection of the common law cases see 60 A.L.R.2d 873 and 15 A.L.R.3d 1189.5 See, e. g., Polizzi v. Trist, 154 So. 2d 84 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1963); Jackson v. Steen, 92 So.2d 280 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1957); Robertson v. Palmer, 55 So.2d 68 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1951).Andry......
-
Tuley v. Heyd
...also Louisiana Revised Statutes 33:1435; Nielson v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, La.Ct.App.1970, 242 So. 2d 91; Pollizzi v. Trist, La.Ct.App.1963, 154 So.2d 84; Gray v. DeBretton, 1939, 192 La. 628, 188 So.2d 4 In Moor v. County of Alameda. 1963, 411 U.S. 693 n. 17, 93 S.Ct. 1785, 36 ......
-
Gates v. Hanover Ins. Co.
...An unlawful assault was commited by a deputy on a prisoner in the official custody of the sheriff in a parish jail, Polizzi v. Trist, 154 So.2d 84 (La.App.4th Cir. 1963); a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action was reversed and the case remanded for trial on allegation that......