Pollard Bearings Corporation v. United States
Decision Date | 27 February 1975 |
Docket Number | Customs Appeal No. 74-13. |
Citation | 511 F.2d 568 |
Court | U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (CCPA) |
Parties | POLLARD BEARINGS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee. |
Joseph F. Donohue and John P. Donohue, Donohue & Shaw, New York City, attorneys of record, for appellant.
Carla A. Hills, Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, Robert B. Silverman, New York City, for the United States.
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 71 Cust.Ct. ___, C.D. 4461, 363 F.Supp. 1191 (1973), overruling appellant's claim for classification and holding that the imported merchandise had been properly classified by the collector of customs. We reverse and remand.
The merchandise, invoiced as "Fan & Pump Shaft Bearing Assemblies—Auto Parts," was classified under item 660.90, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as parts of pumps for liquids and assessed with duty at the rate of 12 per centum ad valorem. These fan and pump shaft bearing assemblies (FPS bearings) are also known in the trade as integral shaft bearings.
Appellant claims that the imported merchandise is properly classifiable under either item 660.52 TSUS as parts of piston-type engines at 8.5 per centum ad valorem or item 692.25 TSUS as parts of motor vehicles at 8.5 per centum ad valorem.
Appellee, in its answer to appellant's complaint, asserted an alternative claim that, if the merchandise was not properly classifiable under item 660.90 TSUS, classification would be proper under item 680.35 TSUS as ball or roller bearings at 3.4 cents per pound plus 15 per centum ad valorem. Appellee stated that the merchandise is more specifically described in item 680.35 TSUS than in items 660.52 or 692.25 TSUS.
The statutes involved are:
Classified under 660.90 Pumps for liquids, whether or not fitted with measuring devices liquid elevators of bucket, chain screw, band, and similar types all the foregoing whether operated by hand or by any kind of power unit, and parts thereof .... 12% ad val Claimed under by appellant: 660.52 Parts of piston-type engines other than compression-ignition engines .................... 8.5% ad val. or Chassis, bodies (including cabs), and parts of * * * motor vehicles: * * * * * * 692.25 Other ...................... 8.5% ad val. Appellee's alternative claim: 680.35 Ball or roller bearings, and parts thereof ................... 3.4¢ per lb.+ 15% ad val.
The court summarized the physical and testimonial evidence of record as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Solder Removal Co. v. US INTERN. TRADE
...evidence, and we will not do so when they are clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence." Accord, Pollard Bearings Corp. v. United States, 511 F.2d 568, 571, 62 CCPA 61, 64, C.A.D. 1146 (1975); Northam Warren Corp. v. United States, 475 F.2d 647, 649, 60 CCPA 117, 119, C.A.D. 1092 (197......
-
Sanyo Elec. Inc. v. United States, C.D. 4855
...to be properly classifiable as parts of bicycles. Other cases which illustrate the "more than" doctrine are Pollard Bearings Corporation v. United States, 511 F.2d 568, 62 CCPA 61, C.A.D. 1146 (1975) (fan and pump shaft bearings "more than" parts for water pumps); Montgomery Ward & Co. v. U......
-
Omark Industries, Inc. v. US
...is co-equal to that of the clutch. To show the importance of the supporting function of the hub, Omark relies on Pollard Bearings Corp. v. United States, 62 CCPA 61, 63, C.A.D. 1146, 511 F.2d 568, 570 (1975), which found that an integral shaft bearing used in certain automobiles had a six i......
-
AMICO, INC. v. United States
...schedules, it is not classifiable under the provision applicable to the latter article. See, e. g., Pollard Bearings Corporation v. United States, 511 F.2d 568, 62 CCPA 61, C.A.D. 1146 (1975); United States v. Acec Electric Corp., 474 F.2d 1009, 60 CCPA 113, C.A.D. 1091 (1973); United State......