Ponce v. State

Docket Number20S04-1308-PC-533
Decision Date05 June 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
24 cases
  • Bautista v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 29, 2021
    ...at the post-conviction hearing that they had explained these rights to defendant prior to the plea). Ponce v. State , 9 N.E.3d 1265, 1270, 1272-73 (Ind. 2014) ( Ponce II ) (emphasis added). [8] Here, our review of the adequacy of the Boykin advisement includes the added layer of language tr......
  • T.D. v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • October 31, 2022
    ...demonstrate that the defendant was advised of his constitutional rights and knowingly and voluntarily waived them." Ponce v. State , 9 N.E.3d 1265, 1270 (Ind. 2014) (quotation omitted). Boykin v. Alabama , 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), "requires that a trial court acce......
  • State v. Diego
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 9, 2021
    ...fluent Spanish, there's no evidence that he was qualified—let alone certified—to interpret under the circumstances. See Ponce v. State , 9 N.E.3d 1265, 1268 (Ind. 2014) ("Ensuring competent interpretation services is ‘an essential component of a functional and fair justice system.’ ") (quot......
  • Nunez v. State, 53A04–1407–CR–346.
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • September 21, 2015
    ...interpreter services in order to improve the quality of language access for LEP [Limited English Proficiency] litigants.” Ponce v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1265, 1269 (Ind.2014).1 Speaking for a unanimous court, he emphasized the need for careful attention to language issues “lest we run the risk of......
  • Get Started for Free