Pontefact v. Isenberger
| Decision Date | 21 December 1900 |
| Citation | 106 F. 499 |
| Parties | PONTEFACT et al. v. ISENBERGER. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
A. H. Clarke, for plaintiffs.
Rose & Putzel, for defendant.
This cause has been submitted upon an agreed statement of facts. It shows that the plaintiffs have the sole right to the use of the trade-mark 'Golden Wedding,' as applied to the whisky of their production, and that the defendant has refilled the plaintiffs' barrels carrying the trade-mark, to palm off his product as that of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are, therefore, entitled to a decree according to the terms of the stipulation. Decree for plaintiffs for $350, according to stipulation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Horlick's Malted Milk Corporation v. HORLUCK'S, INC
...81, 82; Covert v. Travers Bros. Co. (C. C.) 96 F. 568, 569; Weber Medical Tea Co. v. Weber et al. (C. C.) 102 F. 156; Pontefact et al. v. Isenberger (C. C.) 106 F. 499; Worcester Brewing Corp. v. Rueter & Co. (C. C. A.) 157 F. 217; Eagle White Lead Co. v. Pflugh (C. C.) 180 F. 579 at page 5......
-
Searchlight Gas Co. v. Prest-O-Lite Co.
...Evans v. Von Laer (C.C.) 32 F. 153; Hostetter v. Becker (C.C.) 73 F. 297; Hostetter v. Sommers (C.C) 84 F. 333; Pontefact v. Isenberger (C.C.) 106 F. 499; Hostetter v. Martinoni (C.C.) 110 F. 524; Hoboken v. Mohns (C.C.) 112 F. 528; General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co. (C.C.) 128 F. 154;......
-
Soy Food Mills v. Pillsbury Mills
...Co. v. Chandler & Rudd Co., 56 App.D.C. 248, 12 F.2d 189; California Packing Corp. v. Halferty, 54 App.D.C. 88, 295 F. 229; Pontefact v. Isenberger, C. C., 106 F. 499. We have been unable to find any satisfactory explanation of plaintiff's selection of this word. At least its choice is more......
-
Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Bournonville
...quite uniformly held to constitute an infringement of a trade-mark. Van Hoboken v. Mohns & Kaltenbach (C.C.) 112 F. 528; Pontefact v. Isenberger (C.C.) 106 F. 499; General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co. (C.C.) F. 154. While there is no evidence in this case that the defendants directly sol......