Pooler Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. Hogan

CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana
Writing for the CourtELLIS
CitationPooler Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. Hogan, 244 So.2d 62 (La. App. 1971)
Decision Date01 February 1971
Docket NumberNo. 8192,8192
PartiesPOOLER BUILDING MATERIALS, INC. v. Hugh HOGAN, d/b/a Hugh Hogan General Contractors.

Robert A. Dragon, Jr., of Dragon & Kellner, Lafayette, for appellant.

Bernard E. Boudreaux, Jr., Franklin, for appellee.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS, and BLANCHE, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

This suit was originally brought by plaintiff, Pooler Building Materials, Inc., against defendant, Hugh Hogan, d/b/a Hugh Hogan General Contractors, for the balance allegedly due for merchandise sold to Hogan, plus interest and attorney's fees. After suit was filed, but before trial, the principal balance due was paid, leaving only the question of interest and attorney's fees to be considered by the Court. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff has appealed.

The record shows that defendant had been buying building materials from plaintiff for about twelve years. Except for the period during which the sales at issue herein were made, interest and attorney's fees had never been charged by plaintiff. At some time during the year preceding the filing of this suit, plaintiff began using invoices which had the following language printed in small print in the lower left hand corner:

'SALE TERMS: net 30 days of EOM, except as otherwise agreed; interest at 8% Per annum charged on all past due accounts. In the event said account is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, debtor obligates himself to pay attorneys fee in the amount of 25% Of the aggragate balance due on said principal and interest together with all legal costs incurred. Any signature will be recognized as an agent of purchaser . * * *'

When the merchandise covered by the invoices involved in this case was delivered, a copy was signed by an employee of defendant. Another copy was mailed to defendant on the evening of the day the material was delivered. Mr. Hogan testified that he had never entered into a contract to pay 8% Interest or attorney's fees on past due accounts, and that none of his employees were authorized to do so. It is not claimed by plaintiff that defendant was ever notified that interest and attorney's fees would be charged, except by the above statement printed on the invoice. Plaintiff takes the position that, since defendant ordered, accepted, signed for and used the merchandise, he is bound by the terms expressed on the invoice.

Article 2924 of the Civil Code provides, in part, as follows:

'The amount of the conventional interest cannot exceed eight per cent. The same must be fixed in writing; testimonial proof of it is not admitted in any case.'

With respect to attorney's fees, we find the following:

'As a general rule, attorney's fees are...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. International Harvester Co.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1979
    ...to determine if consent is to be implied from the particular circumstances of the case. La.C.C. art. 1818; Pooler Bldg. Mats. Inc. v. Hogan, 244 So.2d 62 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1971). The civil code and statutes do not provide that any legal presumption of consent shall arise from a lessor's sil......
  • Vignette Publications v. Harborview
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana
    • September 12, 2001
    ...where authorized by statute or contract. Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., 256 La. 85, 235 So.2d 386 (1970); Pooler Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. Hogan, 244 So.2d 62 (La.App. 1 Cir.1971). A trial judge has much discretion in fixing attorney's fees, and its award will not be modified by a reviewing ......
  • Bagby v. Dillon, 83-162
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana
    • June 29, 1983
    ...to determine if consent is to be implied from the particular circumstances of the case. La.C.C. art. 1818; Pooler Bldg. Mats. Inc. v. Hogan, 244 So.2d 62 (La.App. 1st Cir.1971)." (Emphasis The Louisiana Civil Code and statutes do not provide that any legal presumption of consent shall arise......
  • S. E. Hornsby & Sons Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. v. Checkmate Ready Mix Concrete, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana
    • September 11, 1980
    ...Petrolane Off. Const. Serv., 294 So.2d 240 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1974), writ refused 296 So.2d 839 (La.1974); Pooler Building Materials, Inc. v. Hogan, 244 So.2d 62 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1971) and Holzer Sheet Metal Works v. Reynolds & Marshall, 43 So.2d 169 (La.App.Orl.1949). Plaintiff is entitled......
  • Get Started for Free