Porowski v. Am. Can Co.

Decision Date30 March 1937
Citation191 A. 296
PartiesPOROWSKI v. AMERICAN CAN CO.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Henry Porowski, employee, opposed by the American Can Company, employer.

Judgment of dismissal.

Alfred Brenner, of Bayonne, for petitioner. Carl S. Kuebler, of Jersey City, for respondent.

WEGNER, Referee.

In the case sub judice facts as to employment and nature thereof are admitted.

Petitioner alleges that he was required to play baseball on a team which represented the respondent and was injured while in that capacity.

The evidence reflects the fact that while respondent company was represented by a ball team that practice was conducted after working hours and that games were played out of working hours. No uniforms were supplied by the company.

The respondent obtained no advantage due to the efforts of the team either as an advertising medium or monetarily.

Briefs were submitted by both sides after the hearing which I have carefully studied and considered.

In Bryant v. Fissell, 84 N.J.Law, 72, 86 A. 458, it was held that an accident arises out of the employment when it is something the risk of which might have been contemplated by a reasonable person when entering the employment as incidental to it. A risk is incidental to an employment when it belongs or is connected with what the workman has to do in fulfilling his obligation, it may be an extraordinary risk directly connected with the employment, or an extraordinary risk which is only indirectly connected with the employment owing to the special nature of the employment.

In Panacona v. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co., 37 N.J.L.J. 75, it was held that a risk is not incidental to the employment when it is not due to the nature of the employment, or when it is a new or added peril to which a workman by his own conduct exposes himself, a peril which his contract of service neither directly or indirectly involves or obliges him to consider.

In Ryan v. State Industrial Commission, 128 Okl. 25, 261 P. 181, it appeared that petitioner's regular employment was that of meter reader. It also appeared, without dispute, that the principal reason petitioner was employed by the company was that he was a good ball player, and therefore a valuable member of a team representing the employees of the company in a local baseball league. It further appeared that the employer in no way participated in supporting the team which represented...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • October 27, 1960
    ...Leventhal v. Wright Aeronautical Corp., 25 N.J.Misc. 154, 51 A.2d 237 (Workmen's Comp.Bd.1946); Porowski v. American Can Co., 15 N.J.Misc. 316, 191 A. 296 (Workmen's Comp.Bd.1937).' 28 N.J., at pp. 587--588, 147 A.2d, at p. 786. The express reservation of the question of compensability of i......
  • Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 20, 1959
    ...Leventhal v. Wright Aeronautical Corp., 25 N.J.Misc. 154, 51 A.2d 237 (Workmen's Comp.Bd.1946); Porowski v. American Can Co., 15 N.J.Misc. 316, 191 A. 296 (Workmen's Comp.Bd.1937). Nor need we concern ourselves with the fact that the plaintiff was not making engagement rings when he was inj......
  • Wilson v. Gen. Motors Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 3, 1949
    ...102 Colo. 59, 76 P.2d 741, 115 A.L.R. 990;Leventhal v. Wright Aeronautical Corp., 51 A.2d 237, 25 N.J.Misc. 154;Poroski v. American Can Co., 191 A. 296, 15 N.J.Misc. 316;Pate v. Plymouth Mfg. Co., 198 S.C. 159, 17 S.E.2d 146, supra; State Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Industrial Comm., 235......
  • Linderman v. Cownie Furs
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1944
    ... ... West Hotel Co., 193 Iowa 1288, 188 N.W. 870, 31 A.L.R. 1245; ... F. Becker Asphaltum R. Co. v. Industrial Comm., 333 Ill. 340, ... 164 N.E. 668; Ryan v. State Ind. Comm., 128 Okl. 25, 261 P ... 181; Hildebrand v. McDowell Furniture Co., 212 N.C. 100, 193 ... S.E. 294; Porowski v. American Can Co., [234 Iowa 713] 191 A ... 296, 15 N.J. Misc. 316; Clark v. Chrysler Corp., 276 Mich ... 24, 267 N.W. 589; Industrial Commission of Colorado v ... Murphy, 102 Colo. 59, 76 P.2d 741, 115 A.L.R. 990; ... McManus' Case, 289 Mass. 65, 193 N.E. 732; Lehman v. B ... F. Nelson ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT