Porter v. State, No. 88 Sept. Term, 2016
Court | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland |
Writing for the Court | Adkins, J. |
Citation | 455 Md. 220,166 A.3d 1044 |
Decision Date | 07 August 2017 |
Docket Number | No. 88 Sept. Term, 2016 |
Parties | Karla Louise PORTER v. STATE of Maryland |
455 Md. 220
166 A.3d 1044
Karla Louise PORTER
v.
STATE of Maryland
No. 88 Sept. Term, 2016
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
August 7, 2017
Argued by Marta K. Kahn, Assigned Public Defender (The Law Office of Marta K. Kahn, LLC, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Petitioner.
Argued by Brenda Gruss, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian E. Frosh, Atty. Gen. of Maryland,
Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondent.
Argued before Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ.
Adkins, J.
Battered spouse syndrome is a form of posttraumatic stress disorder that develops in victims of intimate partner violence. Maryland law allows a woman on trial for harming her abuser to present evidence explaining battered spouse syndrome and its psychological effects regardless of whether she was the first aggressor, used excessive force, or failed to retreat. Md. Code (1991, 2013 Repl. Vol.), § 10–916(b) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article ("CJP").1 This case asks us to analyze how Maryland's battered spouse syndrome statute interacts with the elements of imperfect self-defense. It presents
the question of whether a defendant who contracted with a third-party to kill her abusive husband can present sufficient evidence that she felt as though she was in imminent danger to be entitled to an imperfect self-defense jury instruction.
FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner Karla Louise Porter met her husband, William Raymond Porter ("Ray"), in 1982. While they were dating, Ray began exhibiting controlling behaviors. He called Porter at work multiple times a day to make sure she was in her office. He told her that she should spend all of her time maintaining their household or helping him with various tasks. Porter stopped spending time with her friends because Ray "didn't allow it."
After they were married in 1986, Ray began physically and verbally abusing Porter. At trial, Porter testified to numerous instances of violent abuse throughout their 24–year marriage, including that her husband had: beaten her with a belt; hit her with a wooden board; pushed her head into her mother's headstone and told her that she "should be with [her] dead mother"; stabbed a drill into her stomach, leaving a large scar; hit her with a rake; smeared dog excrement across her back; hit her with a toolbox; kicked her in the side; shoved her head into leaking sewage; and given her a black eye. She also testified that on multiple occasions he had: told her that she was "worthless" and "should die"; threatened to kill her; and forced her to drink water until she urinated on herself. Porter testified that she did not call the police or leave Ray after any of these instances of abuse because she was afraid he would retaliate. When asked why she did not move out of their home, she testified, "I knew he would follow me. I knew that there was no getting away."
Porter testified that Ray's physical and verbal abuse escalated in the year preceding his death. During this time, Ray repeatedly expressed a desire to move to Florida. Porter testified, "I felt if I went he was going to kill me there in Florida. I had no family there, no children." She explained
that on previous visits to Florida,
Ray had threatened to feed her to the alligators. In early 2010, Ray picked up one of his handguns and began yelling about moving to Florida. He told Porter that he did not want to take their children or his parents with them when they moved. He pointed his gun at her head and said, "Maybe I am not even going to take you. I should just kill you now." At the end of February 2010, Ray hit Porter across the back with a crutch because he felt that she did not adequately sympathize with the fact that he was bored. Porter testified that in the weeks leading up to Ray's death she was "terrified almost on a daily basis." She explained that "things were getting so bad, things were just out of control.... It was just day-to-day—it wasn't even day-to-day. It was minute-to-minute. Always walking on eggshells."
Beginning in mid–2009, Porter approached multiple people about killing her husband. That summer, she gave her daughter's boyfriend, Daniel Blackwell, $1,000 to "take care of" her husband. The week before Christmas, she asked one of Ray's coworkers, Tony Fails, to kill him. When asked why she solicited Fails to kill Ray, Porter testified, "It was getting so bad that I knew that Ray was going to kill me and I just wanted to kill him first." Neither Blackwell nor Fails took any action against Ray. In January 2010, Porter asked an acquaintance, Paige Huemann, if she knew where she could get some potassium cyanide to poison Ray. Eventually, Porter's nephew, Seamus Coyle, put her in touch with Walter Bishop, who agreed to kill her husband in exchange for $400. As to her mental state on the day her husband was shot, Porter testified, "In my mind, I knew he was going to kill me at any point."
On the morning of Ray's death, March 1, 2010, Porter told him that the alarm had gone off at the gas station that they owned. Ray went to the station, and around 6:30 a.m., Bishop came in and shot Ray twice. Immediately afterwards, Porter called 911 and told the police that the gas station had been robbed and that the thief had shot her husband. About a week later, Porter was arrested for her role in Porter's killing. She admitted to police that she had paid Bishop to "beat [ ] up"
her husband. Porter was charged with first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, three counts of solicitation to commit first-degree murder, and use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence.
During the trial, Porter presented two expert witnesses to testify as to her mental state at the time of Ray's killing. Dr. Neal Blumberg, a forensic psychiatrist, testified that he met with Porter on five occasions while she was awaiting trial. He explained that he administered a variety of psychological tests and evaluations, and concluded to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Porter was suffering from major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Dr. Blumberg testified that Porter "described the relationship with her husband as escalating in a very negative direction," but that "her coping style was not to assert herself or go to the police." He testified, "Her response to that progressive abuse was to cover things over, to deny, to repress, to sort of avoid thinking about what was going on with the hopes that ... things would settle down ...." Due in part to this response, which Dr. Blumberg referred to as "learned helplessness," he concluded to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that Porter was suffering from battered spouse syndrome as defined in CJP § 10–916.
Dr. Mary Ann Dutton, a clinical psychologist, also testified for Porter. Dr. Dutton testified at length about the effects of chronic abuse on an individual's mental state, including describing common reasons
women do not leave their abusers. She explained that victims of intimate partner violence often suffer from depression and hyperarousal, or "being on the lookout all the time." Dr. Dutton testified that battered woman syndrome can "augment" a woman's perception of the danger that she faces—it can make it seem more threatening. Battered women often utilize personal coping mechanisms, such as "trying to keep the peace," Dr. Dutton explained, as opposed to public mechanisms, such as going to the police. She testified that she met with Porter twice and concluded to a reasonable degree of psychological certainty that Porter "experienced repeated abuse in the context of her marriage" and
suffered from psychological effects as a result. Dr. Dutton also testified that she evaluated Porter's marriage using an instrument developed at Johns Hopkins University to identify relationships in which an abused spouse is in life-threatening danger. She explained that a number of the risk factors were present in the Porters' relationship, including escalation in the severity of the abuse, frequent use of alcohol, extensive jealousy, and death threats.
Porter also presented lay witness testimony describing Ray's abuse. Porter's childhood friend, Ray Naimaster, testified that Porter was "standoffish" when he came across her and her husband while they were shopping. When Naimaster asked her about it later, Porter told him that Ray was jealous. Naimaster asked Porter if her husband was abusing her, and he testified that she "got small" and "[d]idn't say anything" in response. Porter's pastor, Johnny Brewer, testified that Porter told him that she was experiencing verbal abuse and that she stopped regularly attending church about two years before her husband's death. Gertrude Lorraine Briggs, the Porters' co-worker and occasional housekeeper, testified that she...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harris v. State, 9, Sept. Term, 2017
...testimony that Mr. Harris had given a false address was indeed accurate, and thus Mr. Harris's credibility. See Porter v. State , 455 Md. 220, 253–54, 166 A.3d 1044 (2017) ; Hunter v. State , 397 Md. 580, 597, 919 A.2d 63 (2007). It is quite possible that Gaskins's testimony was intentional......
-
Nicholson v. State, 862, Sept. Term, 2017
...the defendant has the "burden of initially producing ‘some evidence’ on the issue of mitigation or self-defense." Porter v. State , 455 Md. 220, 240, 166 A.3d 1044 (2017) (quoting 239 Md.App. 240 Wilson v. State , 422 Md. 533, 541, 30 A.3d 955 (2011) ). This standard is "a fairly low hurdle......
-
Wallace-Bey v. State, 476 Sept. Term 2016
...beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in perfect or imperfect 172 A.3d 1023self-defense. Porter v. State(Porter II), 455 Md. 220, 236, 166 A.3d 1044 (2017) (citing Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 217, 571 A.2d 1251 (1990) )."Perfect self-defense is a complete defense to murd......
-
Blair v. Austin, 35, Sept. Term, 2019
...was before the Court of Special Appeals for review.2 Lack of excessive force is an element of perfect self-defense, see Porter v. State, 455 Md. 220, 234-35, 166 A.3d 1044, 1053 (2017), which is a defense to a claim for assault, see Richardson v. McGriff, 361 Md. 437, 453, 762 A.2d 48, 56 (......
-
Wallace-Bey v. State, No. 476 Sept. Term 2016
...beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in perfect or imperfect 172 A.3d 1023self-defense. Porter v. State(Porter II), 455 Md. 220, 236, 166 A.3d 1044 (2017) (citing Dykes v. State, 319 Md. 206, 217, 571 A.2d 1251 (1990) )."Perfect self-defense is a complete defense to murd......
-
Nicholson v. State, No. 862, Sept. Term, 2017
...the defendant has the "burden of initially producing ‘some evidence’ on the issue of mitigation or self-defense." Porter v. State , 455 Md. 220, 240, 166 A.3d 1044 (2017) (quoting 239 Md.App. 240 Wilson v. State , 422 Md. 533, 541, 30 A.3d 955 (2011) ). This standard is "a fairly low hurdle......
-
Hayes v. State, No. 500, 556, Sept. Term, 2019
...defendant, which, if believed, would support his claim that he acted in self-defense, the defendant has met his burden. Porter v. State , 455 Md. 220, 240, 166 A.3d 1044 (2017) (cleaned up). In the same case, the Court of Appeals explained the elements of imperfect self-defense:Imperfect se......
-
Blair v. Austin, No. 35, Sept. Term, 2019
...was before the Court of Special Appeals for review.2 Lack of excessive force is an element of perfect self-defense, see Porter v. State, 455 Md. 220, 234-35, 166 A.3d 1044, 1053 (2017), which is a defense to a claim for assault, see Richardson v. McGriff, 361 Md. 437, 453, 762 A.2d 48, 56 (......