Porter v. Stormont-Vail Hospital
Decision Date | 05 December 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 51136,STORMONT-VAIL,51136 |
Citation | 621 P.2d 411,228 Kan. 641 |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Parties | Danny R. PORTER, Appellant, v.HOSPITAL, Appellee. |
Syllabus by the Court
In an action by a judgment debtor against his creditor seeking actual and punitive damages for malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprisonment and abuse of process, the record is examined and it is held the trial court did not commit error in granting summary judgment to the defendant.
Leonard W. McAnarney, Lyndon, argued the cause and was on brief, for appellant.
Justice B. King, of Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, Topeka, argued the cause and Edwin D. Smith, Topeka, of the same firm, and Wayne T. Stratton and Patrick Salsbury of Goodell, Cogswell, Stratton, Edmonds, Palmer & Wright, Topeka, were with him on brief, for appellee.
Plaintiff-appellant, Danny R. Porter, appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment to the defendant-appellee, Stormont-Vail Hospital. This case grows out of an action originally filed by Stormont-Vail against Porter in the magistrate court of Shawnee County to collect a hospital bill for services rendered to Porter. Stormont-Vail recovered a default judgment against Porter for the sum of $478.18. The judgment remains unpaid. Post-judgment collection procedures were instituted in the magistrate court and on three occasions between April, 1974, and January, 1977, Porter was arrested on bench warrants issued by the judge of the magistrate court upon Porter's failure to appear in response to court orders directing him to appear. Porter was incarcerated briefly on the first two bench warrants and posted a bond at the time of his arrest on the third. He then filed this action in the district court seeking actual and punitive damages based upon allegations of malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprisonment and abuse of process. Following discovery both parties filed motions for summary judgment and the motion of the defendant was sustained.
K.S.A. 60-256(c) provides in part:
"The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law."
We do not deem it necessary to once again set forth the basic principles which apply when a motion for summary judgment is before the court. They were recently set forth at length in Fredricks v. Foltz, 225 Kan. 663, 666, 594 P.2d 665 (1979).
The learned trial judge filed an extensive memorandum decision and order as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McShares, Inc. v. Barry
...for the purpose of harassing or causing hardship, which resulted in damage to the state court plaintiff. Porter v. Stormont-Vail Hospital, 228 Kan. 641, 653-54, 621 P.2d 411 (1980). With regard to potential for contravening federal policy, defendants/ appellees suggest that state courts' en......
-
Harte v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Johnson Cnty., Case No. 13–2586–JWL
...125 S.Ct. 1465, 161 L.Ed.2d 299 (2005) (officer's authority to detain incident to a search is categorical); Porter v. Stormont–Vail Hosp ., 228 Kan. 641, 621 P.2d 411, 416 (1980) (any imprisonment arising from execution of valid warrant does not constitute false imprisonment under Kansas la......
-
McGregor v. City of Olathe, Ks
...perverted, or improper use of process, and (3) that damage resulted to the plaintiff from the irregularity. Porter v. Stormont-Vail Hosp., 228 Kan. 641, 646, 621 P.2d 411, 416 (1980). Other than plaintiff's bare, unsupported allegations, there exists no evidence in the record that the defen......
-
Good v. Bd. of County Com'Rs of County of Shawnee
...or improper use of the process, and (3) that damage resulted to the plaintiff from the irregularity. Porter v. Stormont-Vail Hospital, 228 Kan. 641, 621 P.2d 411, 416 (1980) (citations and quotations omitted). The gist of tort of abuse of process is not commencing an action or causing proce......