Post v. Burnham, 9.
Decision Date | 10 November 1897 |
Docket Number | 9. |
Citation | 83 F. 79 |
Parties | POST et al. v. BURNHAM et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
This was an action by Henry A. V. Post and Charles C. Pomeroy, as surviving partners of the firm of Post, Martin & Co., against George Burnham and others, trading as Burnham, Williams & Co., for breach of an implied warranty of title arising upon an alleged sale of four locomotives by defendants to plaintiffs. In the circuit court the judge directed a verdict for defendants, and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The real question in issue between the parties was whether the plaintiffs in fact purchased the locomotives of the defendants; defendants claiming that the purchase was made by plaintiffs from the Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Company, to which the defendants had previously sold the locomotives. There was no question that the original sale by defendants was made to the railway company, and that the locomotives were shipped to them in November, 1892, and put in use on its road. From that time, defendants were pressing the railroad company for payment. Thus, on February 28, 1893 they wrote to the railroad company's general manager as follows:
etc.
To this letter the general manager replied:
On March 16, 1893, Post, Martin & Co., of New York, whose survivors are plaintiffs herein, addressed the following letter to the defendants:
On receipt of the foregoing letter the defendants addressed to Mr. Ashley, president of the railroad company, the following:
To this Mr. Ashley replied by telegram as follows:
'Post, Martin & Co. notification correct, and duly authorized.'
Thereupon defendants wrote to Post, Martin & Co. as follows:
Accompanying this letter were invoices made out to Post, Martin & Co. On March 28, 1893, the defendants again wrote to Post, Martin & Co. as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.
...v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co., 345 Pa. 559, 28 A.2d 913, 143 A.L.R. 1417; 6 Uniform Sales Act, § 12, 69 P.S. § 121; Post v. Burnham, 3 Cir., 1897, 83 F. 79, certiorari denied 169 U.S. 735, 18 S.Ct. 945, 42 L.Ed. 1215; Timberland Lumber Co., Ltd. v. Climax Mfg. Co., 3 Cir., 1932, 61 F.2d 391.......