Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Ingraham
Citation | 228 F. 392 |
Decision Date | 11 December 1915 |
Docket Number | 744. |
Parties | POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE CO. v. INGRAHAM et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Maine |
Woodman & Whitehouse and Arthur Chapman, both of Portland, Me., for complainant.
James A. Connellan, Corp. Counsel, of Portland, Me., for defendants.
PUTNAM Circuit Judge. The respondents named herein are alleged to have been the mayor and aldermen of the city of Portland, and to have had general jurisdiction of the matters to which this bill relates. On the 2d day of August, 1915, the board of mayor and aldermen of the city of Portland passed the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex inf. McKittrick ex rel. City of California v. Missouri Utilities Co.
...Road Co. v. Hines, 215 U.S. 336; Turnpike Co. v. Illinois, 96 U.S. 63; Owensborough v. Cumberland Tel. Co., 230 U.S. 58; Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Ingraham, 228 F. 392; Smith v. Osceola, 178 Iowa 200; Grand Bridge Co. v. Prange, 35 Mich. 400; State v. Northern Ohio Traction Co., 34 Ohio Cir.......
-
State ex inf. Shartel, ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co.
... ... S.Ct. 988, 57 L.Ed. 1389; Detroit United Ry. Co. v ... Detroit, 229 U.S. 39; Postal Tel. Cable Co. v ... Ingraham, 228 F. 392; People v. Lawley, 17 ... Cal.App. 331, 119 P ... ...
-
City of Okmulgee v. Okmulgee Gas Co.
...imposed by the general law of the state or by the corporate powers of the city making the grant." ¶40 In the case Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Ingraham et al., 228 F. 392, the court says:"A permit granted by the mayor and aldermen of a city for the erection of telegraph poles and wires in ......
-
City of Okmulgee v. Okmulgee Gas Co.
... ... In the ... case of Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Ingraham et al. (D ... C.) 228 F. 392, the court says: "A permit granted ... ...