Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Ingraham

Citation228 F. 392
Decision Date11 December 1915
Docket Number744.
PartiesPOSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE CO. v. INGRAHAM et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Maine

Woodman & Whitehouse and Arthur Chapman, both of Portland, Me., for complainant.

James A. Connellan, Corp. Counsel, of Portland, Me., for defendants.

PUTNAM Circuit Judge. The respondents named herein are alleged to have been the mayor and aldermen of the city of Portland, and to have had general jurisdiction of the matters to which this bill relates. On the 2d day of August, 1915, the board of mayor and aldermen of the city of Portland passed the following order:

'City of Portland, Maine. In Board of Mayor and Aldermen.
'August 2, 1915.
'It is hereby ordered that all permits for the construction and maintenance of poles and wires upon the public highway and street known as St. John street, between Park avenue and Danforth street, heretofore issued and given by the municipal officers of the city of Portland to the Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, be and the same are hereby revoked, and the Postal Telegraph-Cable Company is hereby ordered to remove all said poles and wires now maintained or in process of construction upon said St. John street between Park avenue and Danforth street. Said removal of said poles and wires to be made and completed within 60 days from the date of the granting of a permit to said Postal Telegraph-Cable Company to lay conduits for the carrying of pipes, wires, and cables under the surface on the easterly side of St. John street, between Park avenue and Danforth street; such laying of said conduits for the carrying of pipes, wires, and cables beneath the surface of the street to be subject to the approval of the commissioner of public works and to the city electrician of the city of Portland: Provided, said Postal Telegraph-Cable Company makes application for such permit within 7 days after the date of the passage of this order; and provided that said poles and wires be entirely removed and said conduits for carrying said pipes, wires, and cables installed and completed within 60 days from the granting of said permit; and provided, further, that the first work done in the laying of said conduits for carrying the said pipes, wires, and cables be in the section of St. John street from the end of the present paving to the offices of the Maine Central Railroad now under process of construction. If the said Postal Telegraph-Cable Company does not make application for a permit to place their or its pipes, wires, and cables underground, and to install conduits for said pipes, wires, and cables underground, then said removal of said poles and wires must be made within 60 days of the date of the passage of this order. And the city clerk of the city of Portland is hereby authorized, directed, and instructed to have a
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State ex inf. McKittrick ex rel. City of California v. Missouri Utilities Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1936
    ...Road Co. v. Hines, 215 U.S. 336; Turnpike Co. v. Illinois, 96 U.S. 63; Owensborough v. Cumberland Tel. Co., 230 U.S. 58; Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Ingraham, 228 F. 392; Smith v. Osceola, 178 Iowa 200; Grand Bridge Co. v. Prange, 35 Mich. 400; State v. Northern Ohio Traction Co., 34 Ohio Cir.......
  • State ex inf. Shartel, ex rel. City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 5, 1932
    ... ... S.Ct. 988, 57 L.Ed. 1389; Detroit United Ry. Co. v ... Detroit, 229 U.S. 39; Postal Tel. Cable Co. v ... Ingraham, 228 F. 392; People v. Lawley, 17 ... Cal.App. 331, 119 P ... ...
  • City of Okmulgee v. Okmulgee Gas Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1929
    ...imposed by the general law of the state or by the corporate powers of the city making the grant." ¶40 In the case Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Ingraham et al., 228 F. 392, the court says:"A permit granted by the mayor and aldermen of a city for the erection of telegraph poles and wires in ......
  • City of Okmulgee v. Okmulgee Gas Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1929
    ... ...          In the ... case of Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Ingraham et al. (D ... C.) 228 F. 392, the court says: "A permit granted ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT