Postal Telegraph Cable Co. of Montana v. Nolan
| Decision Date | 29 March 1917 |
| Docket Number | 50. |
| Citation | 240 F. 754 |
| Parties | POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE CO. OF MONTANA v. NOLAN et al. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Montana |
William Meyer, of Butte, Mont., for plaintiff.
Nolan & Donovan, of Butte, Mont., for defendants.
This case by complaint and proof on an order to show cause is one wherein plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from continued destruction of the former's interstate telegraph lines upon a railroad's right of way (an easement acquired by condemnation) wherein the railroad company and defendants appear to be cotenants in the fee, plaintiff having the railroad company's permit to place the former's wires on the latter's poles on said right of way. All parties hereto are citizens of Montana.
Plaintiff has complied with the federal Telegraphs on Post Roads Act (10 West's Comp. Stats. p. 12335), and claims the case is one arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States. Defendants' only claim is that the railroad company's permit gives plaintiff no right to occupy said right of way that they, cotenants in the fee, are bound to respect, that the issue involves only the local law of cotenancy and is not a case arising under the laws of the United States, and so move to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.
This court has not jurisdiction unless the case arises 'under the laws of the United States. ' A case does not so arise unless it is apparent from the complaint that it involves a substantial dispute respecting the validity, construction, or effect of some federal law, upon the determination of which the result depends. Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 720, 34 Sup.Ct. 892, 58 L.Ed. 1557.
When the law involved has been settled by the Supreme Court, it no longer furnishes a basis for a claim that the case arises under the laws of the United States. Telegraph Co. v Railway Co., 178 U.S. 244, 20 Sup.Ct. 867, 44 L.Ed 1052.
By reason of both these rules, it is believed the instant case does not arise 'under the laws of the United States' hence, no jurisdiction.
The federal act involved, so far as here material, is for the purpose of preventing states and their instrumentalities, as cities, from prohibiting telegraph companies doing business therein. It has nothing to do with the conduct of individuals, whether wrongdoers or otherwise, who hinder the companies' operations. The act confers no right upon such companies to occupy post roads in invitum.
The companies must secure leave from the owners of such roads and their rights therein are not dependent upon nor...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin
...Co., 54 F.(2d) 216, 219 (C. C. A. 10); Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Rd. Commission, 47 F. (2d) 8 (C. C. A. 9); Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Nolan, 240 F. 754 (D. C. Mont.); Silvey v. Commissioners, 273 F. 202, 207 (D. C. S. D. Ohio). It may well be doubted whether the plaintiffs' claim under the ......
-
TOLEDO, P. & WRR v. BROTHERHOOD OF RR TRAINMEN, ETC.
...407; Partridge Lumber Co. v. Michigan Central Ry., 8 Cir., 26 F.2d 615; Peyton v. Railway Express, 5 Cir., 124 F.2d 430; Postal Telegraph v. Nolan, D.C.Mont., 240 F. 754. We well know that the mere fact that Interstate Commerce is involved and may be affected, is not sufficient to justify j......
-
Coblentz v. Sparks
...178 U.S. 239, 20 S.Ct. 867, 44 L.Ed. 1052; Silvey v. Commissioners of Montgomery County, Ohio, D.C., 273 F. 202, and Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Nolan, D.C., 240 F. 754, nevertheless defendants rely in large measure on the case of Valley Farms Co. v. Westchester County, 261 U.S. 155, 43 S......
-
Colonial Drug & Sales Co. v. Western Products Co.
...a federal question. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 244, 20 S. Ct. 867, 44 L. Ed. 1052; Postal Tel. Cable Co. of Montana v. Nolan (D. C.) 240 F. 754; Silvey v. Commissioners of Montgomery County, Ohio (D. C.) 273 F. 202, 207. A suit does not arise under the Consti......