Pottorff v. The Fidelity Coal Mining Company
Decision Date | 09 March 1912 |
Docket Number | 17,525 |
Citation | 122 P. 120,86 Kan. 774 |
Parties | MINNIE POTTORFF, Appellant, v. THE FIDELITY COAL MINING COMPANY et al., Appellees |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1912.
Appeal from Cherokee district court.
Judgment reversed.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
1. NEGLIGENCE--Personal Injuries--"Independent Contractor." When a person lets out work to another, the contractee reserving no control over the work or workmen, the relation of contractor and contractee exists and not that of master and servant, and the contractee is not liable for the negligent or improper execution of the work by the contractor.
2. "INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR" DEFINED. An independent contractor generally is one who, exercising an independent employment, contracts to do a piece of work according to his own methods and without being subject to control of his employer, except as to the result of his work.
3. "INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR" Employer--Employee--Liability. An employer may make himself liable by retaining the right to direct and control the time and manner or means of executing the work, although he may inspect and supervise it to the extent necessary to produce the result intended by the contract without incurring such liability.
4. "INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR" Independent Contractor. A contract between the owner of a coal mine and another party for its operation, is examined, and it is held that this party is not an independent contractor within the rules stated in the above paragraphs.
Ralph S. Nelson, and E. H. Ware, for the appellant.
W. R. Cowley, Al F. Williams, W. C. Scarritt, J. Walter Farrar, and W. R. Thurmond, for the appellees.
The principal issue is between the appellant, Minnie Pottorff, and the Fidelity Coal Mining Company, appellee, and arises upon a demurrer to a reply. The determination of this issue rests upon the legal effect of a written contract between the coal mining company and Barrett. This instrument contains the following provisions:
The schedule...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Robertson
... ... insurance company for conspiracy to fix rates, held not ... constitutionally ... Hugh B ... Miller v. Fidelity Insurance Company, et al., 88 So. 711 ... RATING ... Conlin ... Mining Company (C. C. A.), 255 F. 745; Coder v. Arts, 152 F ... 358 (Quoting 4 Words & Phrases, p ... 3542); Pottorff v. Fidelity Coal Mining Company, 122 P. 120, ... 122, 86 ... ...
-
Mendel v. Fort Scott Hydraulic Cement Co.
...way of financial or other benefit to the contractor.' "This definition and comment accord with our own pronouncements. Pottorff v. Mining Co., 86 Kan. 774, 122 P. 120, syl. par. 2; Maughlelle v. Mining Co., 99 412, 161 P. 907; Brownrigg v. Allvine Dairy Co., 137 Kan. 209, 19 P.2d 474." The ......
-
Martin v. Republic Steel Co.
... ... against the Republic Steel Company to recover compensation ... for injuries sustained in ... relation to the point contested. Crescent Coal Co. v ... Simmons, 217 Ala. 367, 116 So. 512; Ex parte ... Unterkircher, ... 97 Iowa, 509, 66 N.W. 776; Pottorff v. Fid. Coal Min ... Co., 86 Kan. 774, 122 P. 120; Waters ... ...
-
National Labor Relations Board v. Blount
...Commission, Utah, 116 P.2d 929; National Tunnel & Mines Co. v. Industrial Commission, 99 Utah 39, 102 P.2d 508; Pottorff v. Fidelity Coal Min. Co., 86 Kan. 774, 122 P. 120; Lewis v. Detroit Vitrified Brick Co., 164 Mich. 489, 129 N.W. 726; Arizona-Hercules Copper Co. v. Crenshaw, 21 Ariz. 1......