Potts Et Al v. Chumasero Et Al
| Decision Date | 01 October 1875 |
| Citation | 23 L.Ed. 499,92 U.S. 358 |
| Parties | POTTS ET AL. v. CHUMASERO ET AL |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Sect. 1 of an act of the legislature of the Territory of Montana, approved Feb. 11, 1874 (Laws of Montana, 8th sess., 1874, p. 43), provides,——- 'That the seat of government of the Territory of Montana be, and the same is hereby, changed from the city of Virginia, in the county of Madison, to the town of Helena, in the county of Lewis and Clark, upon the approval hereof as hereinafter provided.'
Sect. 2 provides that the question of removal shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory at the general election to be held in 1874.
Sect. 3 prescribes the method of voting on the question, and provides, that, if a greater number of votes are cast for the removal than against it, 'it shall be taken, deemed, and held that this law has been duly approved, and that the seat of government of the Territory of Montana has been in due form of law removed to the said town of Helena, and the governor shall make public proclamation thereof.'
Sect. 5 provides that the votes cast for the approval of this law shall be counted, returned, and canvassed in the same manner and by the same persons and officers as votes for delegate in Congress.
Sect. 20 of the codified statutes of Montana (c. 23, p. 466) makes it 'the duty of the secretary of the Territory, with a marshal of the Territory or his deputy, in presence of the governor, to proceed within thirty days after the election, and sooner if the returns be received, to canvass the votes given for delegate for Congress; and the governor shall grant a certificate of election to the person having the highest number of votes, and shall issue a proclamation declaring the election of such person.'
At the general election held in the Territory on the 3d of August, 1874, the electors voted on the approval or disapproval of the law above referred to.
On the 2d September, 1874, thirty days after the election, the secretary and marshal of the Territory, in the presence of the governor, opened and canvassed the votes returned from the several counties of the Territory, recorded and signed the certificate of the court, and adjourned sine die. The canvass thus made showed a majority of the votes against removal.
On the 11th December, 1874, the defendants in error filed a petition in the Supreme Court of the Territory, setting forth that they are resident citizens of Helena, in Montana Territory, and are attorneys and counsellors-at-law; that in the course of their practice, in order to attend the sessions of the Supreme Court, 'they are required and compelled to make frequent journeys to the seat of government of said Territory; that heretofore they have been required and compelled to make frequent journeys to the city of Virginia,' where the seat of government was located, and where it has hitherto remained, and where the records of said court, and clerk thereof, continue to remain; that, in order to attend to their professional duties, they are obliged to expend large sums of money in and about defraying their expenses for fare in stage-coaches thereto and therefrom, and for board and lodging at hotels along the route and at said city; and that they are therefore beneficially interested in having the seat of government and the Supreme Court of said Territory removed to Helena, which is about one hundred miles distant from said city.
The...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Frost
...70, concerning the custody of a child; Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487, 6 Sup. Ct. 148, 29 L. Ed. 458, habeas corpus; Potts v. Chumasero, 92 U. S. 358, 23 L. Ed. 499; and Smith v. Adams, 130 U. S. 167, 9 Sup. Ct. 566, 32 L. Ed. 895, controversies over the location of a county seat; South Ca......
-
Whittemore v. Farrington
...requirement,6 Barry v. Mercein, 1847, 5 How. 103, 120, 46 U.S. 103, 120, 12 L.Ed. 70 (custody of child); Potts v. Chumasero, 1875, 92 U.S. 358, 23 L.Ed. 499; Kurtz v. Moffitt, 1885, 115 U.S. 487, 6 S.Ct. 148, 29 L.Ed. 458 (habeas corpus); Simms v. Simms, 1899, 175 U.S. 162, 20 S.Ct. 58, 44 ......
-
Donaldson v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.
...v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co., 40 Minn. 213, 215, 41 N.W. 1020; Chumasero v. Potts, 2 Mont. 242, 258-272, writ of error dismissed 92 U.S. 358, 23 L.Ed. 499; State ex rel. Valley Center Drain Dist. v. Board of Com'rs of Big Horn County, 105 Mont. 290, 293, 72 P.2d 461; Mayer v. State, 52 Ne......
-
Kurtz v. Moffitt Moffitt v. Kurtz
...of personal freedom,' clearly implies that writs of habeas corpus would not be included if not specially mentioned. See, also, Potts v. Chumasero, 92 U. S. 358; Elgin v. Marshall, 106 U. S. 578, 580; S. C. 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484; Curt. U. S. Ct. From this review of the statutes and decisions, ......