Powell v. Powell

Decision Date14 May 1945
Docket Number35853.
CitationPowell v. Powell, 198 Miss. 301, 22 So.2d 160 (Miss. 1945)
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesPOWELL v. POWELL.

G. W. Hosey, of Laurel, for appellant.

A S. Scott, of Laurel, for appellee.

McGEHEE, Justice.

This appeal is from a decree which denied the husband a divorce from his wife on a charge of adultery. The appellant assigns two grounds for a reversal of the case: (1) that the trial court was in error in holding that the proof was insufficient to sustain the charge; and (2) that it was error not to permit their son, who was more than fifteen and one-half years of age, to testify as a witness on behalf of the appellant in regard to certain facts and circumstances strongly tending to establish the charge complained of, when taken and considered in connection with the other testimony.

In view of our conclusion to reverse and remand the cause for a new trial because of the second ground of error assigned, we refrain from commenting as to the weight of the evidence actually introduced. It is sufficient to say that the rule against permitting children of tender years to testify in a divorce proceeding between their parents has no application to a child as far advanced in years as the witness here involved, and especially where the child is able to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Stewart v. Superior Court In and For County of Maricopa
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 1989
    ...Buck v. Buck, 320 Mich. 624, 31 N.W.2d 829, 831 (1948); People v. Amos, 163 Mich.App. 50, 414 N.W.2d 147, 149 (1987); Powell v. Powell, 198 Miss. 301, 22 So.2d 160 (1945); State v. Bruce, 655 S.W.2d 66, 68 (Mo.Ct.App.1983); In re Gail D., 217 N.J.Super. 226, 525 A.2d 337 (1987); In re Franc......
  • Jethrow v. Jethrow
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1990
    ...is so well grounded in wisdom and common sense that it has never been challenged in this Court except in one case. In Powell v. Powell, 198 Miss. 301, 22 So.2d 160 (1945), this Court reversed because the chancellor would not permit a fifteen-and-one-half-year-old son of the parties to testi......
  • Wallace v. Wallace
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • September 24, 2021
    ...; Louks v. Louks, 345 Ill. App. 185, 102 N.E.2d 364 (1951) ; Chavigny v. Hava, 125 La. 710, 51 So. 696 (1910) ; Powell v. Powell, 198 Miss. 301, 22 So. 2d 160 (1945) ; Ames v. Ames, 231 Mich. 347, 204 N.W. 117 (1925) ; Morrone v. Morrone, 44 N.J. Super. 305, 130 A.2d 396 (1957) ; Schafer v.......
  • Ex parte Harris
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1984
    ...56 (1975); Louks v. Louks, 345 Ill.App. 185, 102 N.E.2d 364 (1951); Chavigny v. Hava, 125 La. 710, 51 So. 696 (1910); Powell v. Powell, 198 Miss. 301, 22 So.2d 160 (1945); Ames v. Ames, 231 Mich. 347, 204 N.W. 117 (1925); Morrone v. Morrone, 44 N.J.Super. 305, 130 A.2d 396 (1957); Schafer v......
  • Get Started for Free