Powell v. Schimpf
| Decision Date | 13 June 1907 |
| Citation | 44 So. 1044,154 Ala. 665 |
| Parties | POWELL v. SCHIMPF. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Samuel B. Browne, Judge.
Action for assault and battery between William Powell and Charles Schimpf.From a judgment in favor of the latter, the former appeals.
Affirmed.
W. C. Fitts, for appellant.
McAlpine & Robinson, for appellee.
Action for damages for an assault and battery.Affirmed, on the authority of Irby v. Wilde (at the present term)43 So. 574.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Byars v. James
... ... Wilde, 150 Ala. 402, 43 So. 574; ... Anniston Elec. & Gas Co. v. Rosen, 159 Ala. 195, ... 208, 212, 48 So. 798, 133 Am. St. Rep. 32; Powell v ... Schimpf, 154 Ala. 665, 44 So. 1044 [memo.]; King ... Land & Imp. Co. v. Bowen, 7 Ala. App. 462, 480, 61 So ... 22). The specifications of ... ...
-
Advertiser Co. v. Jones
... ... Sloss-Sheffield Co. v. Dickinson, 52 So. 594; ... Irby v. Wilde, 150 Ala. 402, 43 So. 574; Powell v ... Schiff (reported as mem.) 154 Ala. 665, 44 So. 1044. See ... opinion in 52 So. 594 ... The ... writer is of the opinion that ... ...
-
Miller v. McGuire
... ... damages claimed in the complaint. Irby v. Wilde, 150 ... Ala. 402, 43 So. 574; Powell v. Schimpf, 154 Ala ... 665, 44 So. 1044; S.S.S. & I. Co. v. Dickinson, 167 ... Ala. 211, 52 So. 594 ... Under ... these decisions, we ... ...
-
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Dickinson
...count of the complaint was in Code form, and contained no claim for mental anguish. This court, in the recent case of Powell v. Schimpf, 154 Ala. 665, 44 So. 1044, reaffirmed the case of Irby v. Wilde, 150 Ala. 43 So. 574, and stated in the opinion in manuscript, but which is not reported i......
Get Started for Free