Powell v. Schimpf
| Decision Date | 13 June 1907 |
| Parties | POWELL v. SCHIMPF. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Samuel B. Browne, Judge.
Action for assault and battery between William Powell and Charles Schimpf. From a judgment in favor of the latter, the former appeals.
Affirmed.
W. C. Fitts, for appellant.
McAlpine & Robinson, for appellee.
Action for damages for an assault and battery. Affirmed, on the authority of Irby v. Wilde (at the present term) 43 So. 574.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Byars v. James
... ... Wilde, 150 Ala. 402, 43 So. 574; ... Anniston Elec. & Gas Co. v. Rosen, 159 Ala. 195, ... 208, 212, 48 So. 798, 133 Am. St. Rep. 32; Powell v ... Schimpf, 154 Ala. 665, 44 So. 1044 [memo.]; King ... Land & Imp. Co. v. Bowen, 7 Ala. App. 462, 480, 61 So ... 22). The specifications of ... ...
-
Advertiser Co. v. Jones
... ... Sloss-Sheffield Co. v. Dickinson, 52 So. 594; ... Irby v. Wilde, 150 Ala. 402, 43 So. 574; Powell v ... Schiff (reported as mem.) 154 Ala. 665, 44 So. 1044. See ... opinion in 52 So. 594 ... The ... writer is of the opinion that ... ...
-
Miller v. McGuire
... ... damages claimed in the complaint. Irby v. Wilde, 150 ... Ala. 402, 43 So. 574; Powell v. Schimpf, 154 Ala ... 665, 44 So. 1044; S.S.S. & I. Co. v. Dickinson, 167 ... Ala. 211, 52 So. 594 ... Under ... these decisions, we ... ...
-
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Dickinson
...count of the complaint was in Code form, and contained no claim for mental anguish. This court, in the recent case of Powell v. Schimpf, 154 Ala. 665, 44 So. 1044, reaffirmed the case of Irby v. Wilde, 150 Ala. 43 So. 574, and stated in the opinion in manuscript, but which is not reported i......