Powell v. State
| Decision Date | 14 April 1932 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 398. |
| Citation | 141 So. 260,224 Ala. 584 |
| Parties | POWELL v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Petition of Jake Powell for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Powell v. State, 141 So. 259.
Writ denied.
Taylor, Richardson & Sparkman and Robt. W. Milner, all of Huntsville, for petitioner.
Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., opposed.
The Court of Appeals, in its opinion which is before us, has applied the doctrine of error without injury to all matters now pressed upon our attention by petitioner for the writ of certiorari. The opinion of that court does not set forth a "statement of the facts or condition of the record," which would furnish this court a basis for a review of the questions presented by the petition. In this state of the case, the writ must be denied. Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902; Ex parte Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912; Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91; Kirkwood v. State, 184 Ala. 9, 63 So. 990; Ex parte Western Union Tel. Co., 183 Ala. 451, 63 So. 88; Trawick v. State, 217 Ala. 149, 115 So. 79; Parham v. State, 217 Ala. 399, 116 So. 418.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of Birmingham v. Lynch
... ... the doctrine of error without injury. Ex Parte Steverson ... Robinson v. Steverson, 211 Ala. 597, 100 So. 912; ... Allie F. Cleghorn v. State, 219 Ala. 155, 121 So ... 436; Luther Massey et al. v. State, 224 Ala. 584, ... 141 So. 259; Powell v. State, 224 Ala. 584, 141 So ... 260; ... ...
-
McMullian v. State
...of appeal unless the opinion of the court of appeals sets forth a statement of the facts which authorizes such review. Powell v. State, 224 Ala. 584, 141 So. 260; Bishop v. State, 226 Ala. 147, 145 So. 499; Tortomasi v. State, 238 Ala. 253, 189 So. 905; Brown v. State, 249 Ala. 412, 31 So.2......