Powell v. United States
| Decision Date | 02 October 2017 |
| Docket Number | No. 16–1477.,16–1477. |
| Citation | Powell v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 143(Mem), 199 L.Ed.2d 36(Mem) (2017) |
| Parties | Carlos Ellis POWELL and Eric Jerome Powell, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
United States v. Gordon
... ... United States , 468 U.S. 796, 804, 104 S.Ct. 3380, 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984) (quotation marks omitted) ); see also Wong Sun v. United States , 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963) (same); and United States v. Powell , 847 F.3d 760, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 143, 199 L.Ed.2d 36 (2017) (same). A defendant 346 F.Supp.3d 1006 does not only have standing under this doctrine in relation to her own property, but also in relation to property or information from third ... ...
-
United States v. Bateman
... ... Moorehead , 912 F.3d 963, 966 (6th Cir. 2019) (quoting United States v. Buford , 632 F.3d 264, 268 (6th Cir. 2011) ). The evidence is assessed "in the light most likely to support the district court’s decision." Id. (quoting United States v. Powell , 847 F.3d 760, 767 (6th Cir.), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 143, 199 L.Ed.2d 36 (2017) ). "[A] denial of a motion to suppress will be affirmed on appeal if the district court’s conclusion can be justified for any reason." Id ... (alteration in original) (quoting ... ...
-
United States v. Moorehead
... ... Buford , 632 F.3d 264, 268 (6th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). The evidence is reviewed "in the light most likely to support the district court's decision." United States v. Powell , 847 F.3d 760, 767 (6th Cir. 2017), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 143, 199 L.Ed.2d 36 (2017) (citations omitted). "[A] denial of a motion to suppress will be affirmed on appeal if the district court's conclusion can be justified for any reason." United States v. Pasquarille ... ...