Powers v. Elliott

Decision Date27 June 1927
Citation296 S.W. 828,222 Mo.App. 322
PartiesBENJAMIN M. POWERS, RECEIVER, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. T. K. ELLIOTT ET AL., DEFENDANTS; CHARLES W. SCARRITT, APPELLANT.
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County.--Hon. Charles R Pence, Judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Benj. M. Powers, pro se.

Scarritt Jones & North for appellant.

WILLIAMS C. Frank, C., concurs. Bland and Arnold, JJ., concur. Trimble, P. J., absent.

OPINION

WILLIAMS, C.

This is an action by Francis M. Hayward as Receiver of the Commercial Savings Company against T. K. Elliott, C. W. Scarritt and others. A judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and defendant Scarritt has appealed to this court.

No attack was made upon the petition before the trial. However, a vigorous attack is now made upon the petition, and therefore we set out portions of the petition as they apply to the objections here made.

"That the Commercial Savings Company was incorporated under the laws of Missouri on the 23rd day of March, 1922, with a capital of $ 200,000 with 2000 shares of stock of the par value of $ 100 each; that none of such stock has been paid up, that in July, 1922, said company took a lease at a high monthly rental upon a banking room in the Scarritt Building in Kansas City, Missouri, and began to do a banking business at a great expense and invited the public to become depositors therein; that on the 2nd day of December, 1922, said company had dissipated the deposits of the depositors and had become hopelessly insolvent owing to its depositors and other creditors over $ 13,000 and had less than $ 500 in cash when said receiver was so appointed; that said receiver under the order of the court has already allowed claims against said company to the amount of $ 13,474.69 on which the wife of W. L. Jones has paid $ 742.70 and said W. L. Jones has paid $ 100 leaving still subsisting claims in the amount of $ 12,631.99; that there are in said receiver's hands funds not exceeding $ 250 of available assets with which to pay such claims and costs of suit.

"That defendant Charles W. Scarritt being a stockholder in the company owning the Scarritt Building and for the purpose of renting banking room in such building to the Commercial Savings Co., on or about July 25, 1922, procured from said W. L. Jones sixteen shares of stock in said company and permitted his name to be used as vice-president and director of said company for the purpose of attracting depositors to said company and by reason thereof great numbers of depositors were attracted to said company and intrusted their savings to said company, and that said Charles W. Scarritt knew (or by the exercise of ordinary care could have known) that no part of such stock was paid up in said Commercial Savings Company; that the par value of said stock so procured by said Charles W. Scarritt was $ 100 per share; that at the purchase of same said defendant promised to pay to said company the par value, to-wit, $ 1600.

"That there are no other solvent stockholders whose stock is unpaid within the jurisdiction of this court and the plaintiff is wholly without adequate remedy at law; that the officers of the company put up on the windows of said banking room where all the public could and did see the name of the company and the statement that its capital was $ 200,000 which facts all said defendants knew and permitted to be done and by reasons whereof many persons who are now creditors of said company believing said statements to be true and that said company had a paid up capital of $ 200,000 deposited their money in said company which implied promise said defendants ought in equity and good conscience be compelled to make good."

In the petition judgment is then asked for the value of the stock so unpaid and which was issued to defendant C. W. Scarritt.

The answer of defendant Charles W. Scarritt, was a general denial.

The evidence showed the appointment of the receiver and order authorizing the institution of this suit.

As to the claims and insolvency of the company there is no question.

The articles of incorporation of the defunct company were offered in evidence. In these articles of incorporation it was recited:

"That the amount of the capital stock of the company is two hundred thousand dollars ($ 200,000) divided into two thousand (2,000) shares of the par value of one hundred dollars ($ 100) each; that two hundred thousand dollars ($ 200,000) thereof has been in good faith subscribed, and one hundred thousand dollars ($ 100,000) thereof actually paid up in lawful money of the United States and is in the custody of the persons named as the first board of directors or managers."

The record shows: "Although the articles of incorporation of the Commercial Savings Company recited that $ 100,000 of the capital stock of said company was actually paid up in lawful money of the United States and was in the custody of the persons named as the first board of directors or managers, as a matter of fact no cash had been paid and no money in any amount had been paid by the subscribers for said stock and there was no money in the hands of the directors named in said articles, at the time of the signing of said articles or at the time of the issuance of the certificate of incorporation of said company. The directors of the Commercial Savings Company at the time of its incorporation held a certificate of deposit for $ 110,000 issued by the Central Trust Company but the Central Trust Company was merely a paper corporation and the certificate of deposit so issued by it did not represent or evidence the deposit of any money with the Central Trust Company by the new company or its directors. The Commercial Savings Company began its business in the Scarritt Building shortly after the issuance of its certificate of incorporation."

The stock book showed: "Sixteen shares issued to C. W. Scarritt; dated July 25, 1922; transferred from W. L. Jones."

The stock certificate which was introduced in evidence corroborates the entry in the stock book.

The defendant did not sign any subscription for stock.

W. L. Jones seems to have been the moving spirit in the enterprises and testified that he had no money or property with which to pay the claims or creditors of the company.

Witness Jones testified that he had never discussed with any one of the persons who acquired stock the manner of incorporation nor informed them that the stock had not been paid for.

It seems that at a meeting of the Executive Committee, Mr. C. W. Scarritt was elected a director in the Commercial Savings Company but was never notified of this election. The evidence shows that W. L. Jones received a letter from C. W. Scarritt, the letter having been lost the witness gave the contents as:

"He agreed to act as vice-president of the company if elected, provided the business was handled according to law, the way he worded it. I am not sure just what it was, but something along that line."

This letter was written about the time Mr. Scarritt took the stock.

The Commercial Savings Company was the successor to the Central Trust Company. The change of name being by reason of the fact that the name of "Central Trust Company" was not available.

A contract was offered in evidence between C. W. Scarritt, W. L. Jones and Commercial Savings Company which is as follows:

"In consideration of the execution by Second Parties of a lease on the banking room in the Scarritt Building in the said city, owned by The Scarritt Estate Company, in which First Party is interested, which lease has this day been executed, said Scarritt has agreed to purchase and has this day purchased from said Jones sixteen (16) shares, of the par value of $ 100 per share, of the capital stock of said Commercial Savings Company, which stock has this day been delivered to First Party, and First Party hereby agrees to pay for same the sum of $ 1600 payable at the rate of $ 200 per month, beginning July first, 1922; provided, however, that said monthly payments shall be made only in the event the terms of said lease have been complied with by the lessees therein; and that in the event said terms have not been complied with, First Party shall not be required to continue payment, but shall return to said Jones an amount of said stock equal to the unpaid balance of said $ 1600 and in such event First Party shall no longer be liable on his contract of purchase.

"In consideration of the premises, Second Parties agree that on July first, 1924, they will, repurchase the stock in said Commercial Savings Company so bought and paid for by First Party, and will pay therefor to First Party or assigns the sum paid by First Party for said stock, or will procure and produce a purchaser for said stock who will pay said First Party or his assigns the amount so paid for said stock by First Party; and said First Party hereby agrees to sell, transfer and deliver said stock upon receipt of such payment. Until the repurchase of said stock, First Party or assigns shall be entitled absolutely to any and all dividends that will be declared or paid on said stock, if the dividends paid do not amount to a sum equal to six per cent per annum of the said sum of $ 1600 from July 1, 1922, to the date of said repurchase of said stock then Second Parties are to pay First Party said interest as part of the repurchase price of said stock.

"Witness Our Hands this 21st day of July, 1922.

"(Signed) CHARLES W. SCARRITT

"W. L. JONES

"COMMERCIAL SAVINGS COMPANY

"By W. L. JONES, President."

Bearing the same date the Scarritt Estate Company made a lease with W. L. Jones and the Commercial Savings Company, beginning on July 1, 1922, and extending until the 30th day of June, 1927....

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT