Prater v. U.S., 79-2527
| Decision Date | 19 May 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-2527,79-2527 |
| Citation | 618 F.2d 263 |
| Parties | Frances C. PRATER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Thomas R. Burnside, Jr., Augusta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
William T. Moore, Jr., U. S. Atty., Savannah, Ga., Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Augusta, Ga., Anne S. Almy, James W. Moorman, Dept. of Justice, Appellate Sect., Land & Natural Resources Div., Attys., Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion Feb. 20, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 612 F.2d 157)
Before GODBOLD, REAVLEY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
We granted rehearing to dispose of the government's concern that our original opinion, Prater v. United States, 612 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1980), expands the scope of the waiver of sovereign immunity for "quiet title" suits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2409a (1976) to actions seeking reformation of a deed. We did not characterize Prater's suit as one in the nature of an action to reform a deed; that label was one affixed by the government. Id. at 159. The opinion clearly indicates that Prater asserted equitable title to the realty, under Georgia trust law, by virtue of Allen's promise of reconveyance. Prater's summary judgment proof (the depositions of Fred Prater and Allen as well as Allen's affidavit) was sufficient to establish the promise to reconvey, and thus raise a claim of equitable title for jurisdictional purposes. See Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731, 735 n.4, 67 S.Ct. 1009, 1010 n.4, 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947); C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 1350 (1969). Because Prater claimed a right, title or interest in the property, section 2409a served as a waiver of sovereign immunity and the district court had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(f) (1976).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Claxton v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMIN. OF US GOVERN.
...meaning than the common law remedy by quia timet. In Prater v. United States, 612 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.), aff'd on rehearing, 618 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1980), the Fifth Circuit concluded that "section 2409a, which was enacted contemporaneously with section 1346(f), waives sovereign immunity ......
-
Friends of Panamint Valley v. Kempthorne
...clear that it had not intended to expand the scope of the Quiet Title Act's limited waiver of sovereign immunity. See Prater v. United States, 618 F.2d 263 (5th Cir.1980). 6. In Long v. Area Manager, Bureau of Reclamation, 236 F.3d 910 (8th Cir.2001), plaintiffs were similarly situated to t......
-
Cummings v. U.S., 80-2298
...U.S.C. § 2409a(a), thus waiving sovereign immunity. Prater v. United States, 612 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.), clarified on rehearing, 618 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1980); Fulcher v. United States, 632 F.2d 278, 282 (4th Cir. 1980) (en banc); McClellan v. Kimball, 623 F.2d 83, 85 (9th Cir. Cummings co......
-
Haeker v. U.S. Gov't
...be "brought and maintained within the constraints of the Quiet Title Act"); Prater v. United States, 612 F.2d 157, 158 on reh'g, 618 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1980) (to seek partition under 28 U.S.C. § 1347, petitioner must "clearly establish tenancy in common or joint tenancy" with the United Sta......