Praylor v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Decision Date | 15 November 2005 |
Docket Number | No. 04-50854 Summary Calendar.,04-50854 Summary Calendar. |
Parties | Joshua PRAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; Ahia Shabaaz; Owen Murray, Medical Director; Josephine Session; William Leslie Northrop; Valencia Pollard; William Gonzales, Dr.; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston Correctional Managed Care Division; Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Joshua Praylor, Gatesville, TX, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
This court's opinion, 423 F.3d 524 (5th Cir.2005), is hereby withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted:
Joshua Praylor, Texas prisoner # 1128305, appeals the denial of his civil rights complaint against numerous officials of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) and the University of Texas and Texas Tech University health care systems (hereinafter, TDCJ). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Praylor argues that the TDCJ's denial of his request for hormone therapy to treat his transsexualism constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. Praylor seeks an injunction seeking to instruct the TDCJ to provide him with hormone therapy and brassieres. His motion is DENIED.
A dismissal for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) is reviewed under the same de novo standard of review applicable to dismissals made pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6). Harris v. Hegmann, 198 F.3d 153, 156 (5th Cir.1999). The Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment protects an inmate from improper medical care, but only if the care is "sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs." Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976).
This circuit has not addressed the issue of providing hormone treatment to transsexual inmates. Other circuits that have considered the issue have concluded that declining to provide a transsexual with hormone treatment does not amount to acting with deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. See, e.g., White v. Farrier, 849 F.2d 322 (8th Cir.1988) ( ); Meriwether v. Faulkner, 821 F.2d 408, 413 (7th Cir.1987) ( ); Supre v. Ricketts, 792 F.2d 958, 963 (10th Cir.1986) ( ). Assuming, without deciding, that transsexualism does present a serious medical need, we hold that, on this record, the refusal to provide hormone therapy...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gibson v. Collier
...persuasive, because, as the majority states at 223–24 note 8, the holdings were limited to the individual cases . In Praylor v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice , our court held that, "on [that] record , the refusal to provide hormone therapy did not constitute the requisite deliberate ......
-
United States v. Varner
...prisoner who was "born male" but has "lived as a female since the age of 15"); see also Praylor v. Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Justice , 430 F.3d 1208, 1208–09 (5th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (using male pronouns to refer to "transsexual[ ]" inmate who sought injunction requiring prison "to provide hi......
-
O'Donnabhain v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...whether GID or transsexualism constitutes a serious medical need for purposes of the Eighth Amendment. See Praylor v. Tex. Dept. of Criminal Justice, 430 F.3d 1208 (5th Cir.2005), withdrawing 423 F.3d 524 (5th Cir.2005) (holding that transsexualism constitutes a serious medical need for Eig......
-
Mayfield v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
...district court erred in concluding that Mayfield failed to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). See Praylor v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice, 430 F.3d 1208, 1209 (5th Cir.2005) (stating that we review dismissals for failure to state a claim under the PLRA under the same standard as dis......
-
Transgender Inmates in Prisons
...Their rise, current practices, and effect on inmates. The Prison Journal, 84, 248-264. Praylor v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 430 F. 3d 1208 (5th Cir. 2005).Robinson, R. K. (2011). Masculinity as prison: Sexual identity, race, and incarceration. California Law Review, 99, Rose, K.......