Pressley v. Wainwright, 73-3113.
| Decision Date | 04 June 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 73-3113.,73-3113. |
| Citation | 493 F.2d 894 |
| Parties | Nathaniel PRESSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Department of Health & Rehabilitation Services, State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, 11th Judicial Circuit, Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Before DYER, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Nathaniel Pressley alleges he was denied effective assistance of counsel in pursuing a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida. We affirm the United States District Court's denial of a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that Pressley has failed to exhaust state remedies. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254.
Pressley's first degree murder conviction was affirmed by the Florida District Court of Appeal. His court-appointed counsel agreed with Pressley that a petition for writ of certiorari to the Florida Supreme Court might be fruitful since one of the three District Court of Appeal judges dissented from an affirmance of his conviction on the ground that the majority's decision was in conflict with a prior decision of another District. One ground for asserting certiorari jurisdiction in Florida is a conflict between District Courts of Appeal. Rule 4.5, subd. c(6), Fla.Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. Counsel said, however, that he could not represent Pressley on the petition and advised him to write to the public defender. Pressley's request for representation was favorably received by the public defender who said that he would represent Pressley when properly substituted as counsel.
By the time the public defender was officially substituted by order of the District Court of Appeal, however, the thirty day time limitation for application for writ of certiorari had expired. The public defender filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Florida Supreme Court. The writ was discharged by the Florida Supreme Court which merely noted that there appeared nothing in the record which entitled Pressley to his liberty.
Pressley's petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied by the federal District Court. We affirm the District Court's denial of relief for failure to exhaust state remedies. Although recognizing that a petition for writ of habeas corpus is the accepted remedy in pursuing an out-of-time appeal in Florida, Pressley's petition in the state court did not clearly state he was merely seeking permission to file a belated application for writ of certiorari. Instead, it asks for Pressley's release because "the petitioner has been denied equal protection of the laws, due process of law, and his right to effective assistance of counsel . . . ." The Florida Supreme Court did not address the possibility of allowing a belated application for certiorari in its denial of habeas corpus relief:
The Court has considered the petition for writ of habeas corpus . . . and is now of the opinion that petitioner, according to the record now before us, is not entitled to his liberty, so the writ of habeas corpus is discharged and petitioner is remanded to custody.
Pressley should proceed in the state court explicitly stating the type relief sought and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johnson v. United States, CASE NO. 8:15-cv-1958-T-27AEP
...cert. denied, 409 U.S. 921 (1972); United States v. Howell, 37 F.3d 1207, 1210 (7th Cir. 1994) (recalling mandate); Pressley v. Wainwright, 493 F.2d 894, 895 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. James, 990 F.2d 804, 805 (5th Cir. 1993) (vacating and reinstating judgment); see also Schreiner v.......
-
Swann v. US
...to file a timely appeal, citing Schreiner v. United States, 404 U.S. 67, 92 S.Ct. 326, 30 L.Ed.2d 222 (1971); Pressley v. Wainwright, 493 F.2d 894, 895 (5th Cir.1974); Jenkins v. United States, 130 U.S.App. D.C. 248, 249, 399 F.2d 981, 982-83 (1968); and Jackson v. United States, 626 A.2d 8......
-
Richardson v. Procunier
...not as intermediate courts of appeal but as the "end of the road in most cases." 452 F.2d at 776. Next, however, in Pressley v. Wainwright, 493 F.2d 894 (5th Cir.1974), we reached a different conclusion and required review by the Florida Supreme Court. In the context of a factual situation ......
-
Pressley v. Wainwright
...dismissed on the merits by the District Court. Pressley v. Wainwright, S.D.Fla., 1973, No. 73-737-CIV-JE. This Court in Pressley v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1974, 493 F.2d 894, affirmed the dismissal based on Prisoner's failure to exhaust state remedies. In light of our opinion and subsequent to......