Preston H. Haskell Co. v. Morgan
Decision Date | 04 February 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 21139,21139 |
Citation | 274 S.C. 261,262 S.E.2d 737 |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | PRESTON H. HASKELL COMPANY, and Construction Southeast, Inc., Respondents, v. William MORGAN; Bonnor Roofing and Sheet Metal Company; Ocean Ventures; Seascape Owners Association, Inc.; and Seascape-at-Hilton Head Horizontal Property Regimes, of whom William Morgan and Ocean Ventures are Appellants. |
Claude M. Scarborough, Jr., and Stephen G. Morrison, of Nelson, Mullins, Grier & Scarborough, Columbia, for appellant Ocean Ventures.
Glenn Bowers of Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, Columbia, for appellant Morgan.
James H. Moss of Moss, Carter, Branton & Bailey, Beaufort, and Larry S. McReynolds, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents.
In this action the plaintiffs-respondents seek a declaratory judgment for the purpose of settling disputes alleged to exist or potentially exist between the plaintiffs and the defendants. William Morgan and Ocean Ventures, two of the defendants, filed separate demurrers, alleging that there was not a justiciable controversy between all of the parties. Both demurrers were overruled by the circuit judge. Morgan and Ocean Ventures have appealed.
Layne v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 271 S.C. 346, 247 S.E.2d 346 (1978).
It is apparent from a review of the record, which included argument of counsel before the circuit judge, that in considering the demurrers many matters submitted to the court should have been ignored. A demurrer attacks the four corners of the instrument under assault. Exhibits and pleadings from other actions between the parties were improperly included in the record. When these are eliminated, the issue becomes simple. A complaint for declaratory judgment is good against demurrer for insufficiency of facts if its allegations show the existence of a justiciable controversy. Guimarin & Doan v. Georgetown Textile & Mfg. Co., 249 S.C. 561, 155 S.E.2d 618 (1967). It is apparent that the trial judge's order should be sustained since the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hitter v. McLeod
...of a justiciable controversy and therefore do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. See Preston H. Haskell Company v. Morgan, S.C., 262 S.E.2d 737 (1980); Guimarin & Doan v. Georgetown Textile & Mfg. Co., 249 S.C. 561, 155 S.E.2d 618 (1967). Accordingly, the lower cour......
-
Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.
...The matters raised by the appellants simply are not alleged in the complaint. This Court recently stated in Preston H. Haskell Company v. Morgan, S.C., 262 S.E.2d 737, 738-739 (1980): "While much of the record submitted to the lower court, and printed in the transcript on appeal, might have......
-
Jackson v. River Pines, Inc., 21386
...true for purposes of the motion, state a cause of action. Pilkington v. McBain, S.C., 262 S.E.2d 916 (1980); Preston H. Haskell Company v. Morgan, S.C., 262 S.E.2d 737 (1980); Whale Branch Corporation v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, S.C., 268 S.E.2d 583 (1980). In South Carolina the purch......
- Holmes v. Black River Elec. Co-op., Inc., 21138