Preston v. Equity Sav. Bank
Decision Date | 05 March 1923 |
Docket Number | 3839. |
Citation | 287 F. 1003 |
Parties | PRESTON v. EQUITY SAV. BANK et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Submitted December 14, 1922.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
Charles H. Merillat, of Washington, D.C., for appellant.
J. D Eason, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Before VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice, and MARTIN and SMITH, Judges of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.
Appellant filed a bill in equity in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia averring in substance, that on four different dates between February 1, 1918, and October 31, 1918, George S. Preston loaned money to George R. Perry, vice president and active manager of the Equity Savings Bank of Washington D.C.; that Perry executed his promissory notes for the respective amounts borrowed, and, as collateral security therefor, transferred to Preston certain shares of stock in defendant bank, and that these shares of stock were deposited, in each instance, with the bank and receipted for as follows:
Equity Savings Bank, by G. R. Perry, V.P.
'Aug. 1, 1918.
'Received from Mr. Geo. S. Preston envelope with four cert. of stock, Nos. 25, 23, 75, 109, also one No. 265, for 16 shares to be delivered on demand, without charge or responsibility for safe keeping.
'Equity Savings Bank by H. V. Gibbons. 'O.K.G.R.P.
'Oct. 31, 1918.'
It is further averred that Perry thereafter became a defaulter and absconded with funds of the bank, for which he was indicted in the District of Columbia in November, 1918; that on March 31, 1919, defendant bank went into voluntary liquidation and made an assignment to defendants Biggs and Sauls, stockholders therein; that these defendants, as trustees, appropriated the stock in question to the use and benefit of the bank and the stockholders thereof; that the bank was a party to the arrangements between Preston and Perry, whereby the stock was to remain in the care and custody of the bank until the maturity of the notes; that Perry has left this jurisdiction and his whereabouts are unknown, hence plaintiff is without remedy against him either at law or in equity; that Preston died since depositing the stock in said bank, and plaintiff succeeded, as administratrix, to all his rights in his estate; and that she has demanded of defendants a return of the certificates of stock or information as to what has become of them, but that defendants refused to return the stock or give her any information in respect of it.
Plaintiff prays for discovery of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of Fairfield
...Com., 26 Idaho 391, 143 P. 1173; Merrill v. National Bank of Jacksonville, 173 U.S. 131, 19 S.Ct. 360, 43 L.Ed. 640; Preston v. Equity Savings Bank, 287 F. 1003.) the right of inspection is founded upon contract it will be enforced even in cases where plaintiff has other means of informatio......
- Fall v. State of Louisiana