Prine v. Syverson
Court | Supreme Court of Nebraska |
Writing for the Court | MAXWELL |
Citation | 56 N.W. 714,37 Neb. 860 |
Parties | PRINE v. SYVERSON ET AL. |
Decision Date | 17 October 1893 |
37 Neb. 860
56 N.W. 714
PRINE
v.
SYVERSON ET AL.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Oct. 17, 1893.
1. One S., being the owner of certain real estate, executed a power of attorney to one H., authorizing him to sell the land, for cash or partly on credit, for not less than $20 per acre. H., being unable to sell at $20 per acre, afterwards sold the land, subject to the approval of his principal, at $2,000 cash. Held, that the weight of the testimony sustained the finding and judgment of the court that the principal had ratified and confirmed the sale.
2. Persons who purchased while the land was in the actual occupancy of another are charged with notice of his rights in the premises.
Appeal from district court, Madison county; Isaac Powers, Judge.
Action by W. T. Prine against Ole Syverson and others for the specific performance of a land contract. Plaintiff had decree, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
[56 N.W. 714]
Searles & Ellsworth and Barnes & Tyler, for appellants.
Allen, Robinson & Reed and M. B. Foster, for appellee.
MAXWELL, C. J.
This is an action to enforce the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. It appears from the record that the defendant Ole Syverson resided in this state from about the year 1870 to 1885. That he was the owner of a quarter section of land at Newman Grove, Madison county. That in May, 1885, he executed a power of attorney to George B. Hovland, as follows:
“Power of Attorney Filed Jan. 2nd, 1890,
[56 N.W. 715]
at 8 A. M. Know all men by these presents, that I, Ole Syverson, of the town of Newman Grove, in the county of Madison and state of Nebraska, do hereby make, constitute, and appoint George B. Hovland, of the town of Newman Grove and state of Nebraska, my true, sufficient, and lawful attorney, for me, and in my name, place, and stead, to conduct and carry on the business of selling for not less than $20 per acre, and giving a deed of general warranty therefor, to rent or to lease, the following described real estate, to wit, all the N. W. 1/4 of the S. E. 1/4 and the N. E. 1/4 of the S. W. 1/4 of sec. 29, township 21 west, north of range 4 west of the 6th principal meridian, Newman Grove, Madison county, Nebraska; to sell, either for cash or on credit, all such property as he may deem useful and proper, connected with said business; to state accounts; to sue and compromise, collect or settle, all claims or demands, due or to become due, now existing or hereafter to arise in my favor; and to adjust, settle, and pay all claims and demands which now exist against me, or may hereafter arise, either as connected with the foregoing business or otherwise; to take the general management and control of my property and business, and to execute and enter into bonds, contracts, and deeds connected therewith; and to release all mortgages that are now on record in the state of Nebraska in my name; and to release any mortgages which may hereafter be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kampman v. Nicewaner, 9,233
...confirmation of the sale, and she is estopped from denying the validity of the bid made by her agents in her behalf. Prine v. Syverson, 37 Neb. 860; Swartz v. Duncan, 38 Neb. 782. H. D. Kelly and Fred H. Free, contra: A judicial sale can be set aside for irregularities and an alias order of......
-
Howard v. Brown
...line; also, that it would necessitate the digging of a new well, and the removal of their tanks, windmill, feed yards, and sheds, to their [56 N.W. 714]great damage and inconvenience. A demurrer to the petition was sustained by the district court, and the action dismissed, whereupon the cau......
-
Kampman v. Nicewaner, 9,233
...confirmation of the sale, and she is estopped from denying the validity of the bid made by her agents in her behalf. Prine v. Syverson, 37 Neb. 860; Swartz v. Duncan, 38 Neb. 782. H. D. Kelly and Fred H. Free, contra: A judicial sale can be set aside for irregularities and an alias order of......
-
Howard v. Brown
...line; also, that it would necessitate the digging of a new well, and the removal of their tanks, windmill, feed yards, and sheds, to their [56 N.W. 714]great damage and inconvenience. A demurrer to the petition was sustained by the district court, and the action dismissed, whereupon the cau......