Priorelli v. Guidi

Decision Date27 February 1925
Citation146 N.E. 770,251 Mass. 449
PartiesPRIORELLI et al. v. GUIDI et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Exceptions from Superior Court, Suffolk County; Morton, Judge.

Action of contract by Romeo Priorelli and others against Ubaldo Guidi and Esterina Guidi.On exceptions of Esterina Guidi to refusal of directed verdict in her favor.Exceptions overruled.

John E. Crowley, of Boston, for plaintiffs.

Frank P. Fralli, of Boston, for defendants.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action of contract on two promissory notes purporting to be signed by the two defendants, who are husband and wife.One of the plaintiffs testified that he lent to the husband two sums of $1,000 each; that he declined to take promissory notes signed by the husband alone, but required the signature of the wife; that the husband after signing the notes in his presence took the notes, which then had only the husband's signature on them, and shortly thereafter presented them to the plaintiff in the form in which they were offered in court, with the statement that the signature of the wife had been put upon the notes by her; and that thereupon the money was advanced.The plaintiffs called both defendants as witnesses.The husband testified that he signed his wife's name to the note without any authority from her and without attempting to disguise his handwriting or imitate that of his wife.The wife testified that the writing of her name on the notes was not her signature and that she did not authorize her husband to write her name.While she was on the witness stand she wrote her signature on a piece of paper, which was received in evidence.No other evidence was introduced.

The...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Haun v. Le Grand
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 10, 1929
    ...established by the statute. A party by calling witnesses does not necessarily become bound by their testimony. Priorelli v. Guildi, 251 Mass. 449, 450, 146 N. E. 770;Gordon v. Bedard (Mass.) 164 N. E. 374, and cases cited; Commonwealth v. Festo, 251 Mass. 275, 278, 279, 146 N. E. 700. See G......
  • Com. v. Pasquale
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • November 13, 1956
    ...windows at the tracks, and that he stated the slip of paper in question had been received by him for that purpose. See Priorelli v. Guidi, 251 Mass. 449, 450, 146 N.E. 770; Haun v. LeGrand, 268 Mass. 582, 584, 168 N.E. 180, and cases cited. It was for the jury to determine whether the bets ......