Property Owners' Materials Co. v. Byrne
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Anderson |
| Citation | Property Owners' Materials Co. v. Byrne, 176 S.W.2d 650 (Mo. App. 1944) |
| Decision Date | 04 January 1944 |
| Docket Number | No. 26289.,26289. |
| Parties | PROPERTY OWNERS' MATERIALS CO. v. BYRNE et al. |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; William L. Mason, Judge.
"Not to be reported in State Reports."
Action by Property Owners' Materials Company against Harry J. Byrne and Loretta Byrne to recover upon a written contract for furnishing defendants with material necessary for a concrete curb and upon a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to furnish defendants such materials as might be necessary for the distributing by the City of St. Louis and W.P.A. of asphaltic penetration on Woodland Avenue in front of defendants' property, wherein the defendants filed a counterclaim for damages on account of faulty material and unworkmanlike construction. From a judgment for defendants on the second count, the plaintiff appeals.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment on second count in the sum of $130.71 with interest from July 15, 1941, the date of filing suit.
Joseph Boxerman, of St. Louis, for appellant.
Edw. E. Hieby, of St. Louis, for respondents.
This suit originated in a justice of the peace court. The petition was in two counts. In the first count, plaintiff sought to recover upon a written contract for furnishing defendants with materials necessary for a concrete curb, to be installed by the City of St. Louis and the W.P.A. on Woodland avenue and bordering on defendants' property. In the second count, plaintiff sought to recover $130.71 and interest upon a contract made with defendants, whereby plaintiff agreed to furnish such materials as might be "necessary for the distributing by the City of St. Louis and W.P.A. of asphaltic penetration on Woodland Avenue" in front of defendants' property, for which materials defendants agreed to make payment immediately upon completion of said street.
The defendants filed an answer and counterclaim, which contained a general denial and the following allegations :
Then followed a prayer for judgment for $749.10 and costs.
The justice of the peace entered a finding and judgment for plaintiff on both counts of the petition, and against the defendants on their counterclaim. Thereupon defendants appealed to the circuit court. During the trial in that court, defendants dismissed their counterclaim, and the case was tried upon the plaintiff's petition and the defendants' answer, resulting in a verdict and judgment for defendants on the second count of the petition. Thereupon plaintiff appealed to this court from the judgment against it on said second count.
The evidence shows that the City of St. Louis and the W.P.A. paved the street in question; and defendant Harry J. Byrne, while on the stand, admitted the execution of the contract in suit. The contract was as follows :
The evidence of both plaintiff and defendants shows that thereafter the asphaltic penetration was applied to the street in question, and that in August, 1940, the work was finished and the street put to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 9689.
...166 F. 231 (8th Cir., Wyo.1908). 18 Daniel v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 221 N.C. 75, 18 S.E.2d 819 (1942). 19 Property Owners' Materials Co. v. Byrne, 176 S.W.2d 650 (Mo.App.1944). Cf. Cuthrell v. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co., 234 N.C. 137, 66 S.E.2d 649 (N.Car. ...
-
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Riefolo Const. Co., Inc.
...& Foreign Ins. Co. v. Allied Plumbing & Heating Co., 36 Mich.App. 561, 194 N.W.2d 158, 161 (Ct.App.1971); Property Owner's Materials Co. v. Byrne, 176 S.W.2d 650, 652 (Mo.Ct.App.1944); Cuthrell v. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co., 234 N.C. 137, 66 S.E.2d 649, 651 (Sup.Ct.1951); Annot., "Builder......
-
PHILADELPHIA FAC. MAN. CORP. v. SAINT PAUL FIRE & MI CO.
...floater policy at issue in the instant case. We have carefully examined the Missouri case cited by St. Paul, Property Owners' Materials Co. v. Byrne, 176 S.W.2d 650 (Mo.App.1944), and two cases from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Millers......
-
Cuthrell v. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. of Milwaukee, Wis.
...be put to the use for which it is intended. Daniel v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 221 N.C. 75, 18 S.E.2d 819; Property Owners' Materials Co. v. Byrne, Mo.App., 176 S.W.2d 650. When the plaintiff's evidence on this aspect of the case is taken in the light most favorable to him, it tends to s......