Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of S.C. v. Episcopal Church

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
CitationProtestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of S.C. v. Episcopal Church, 138 S.Ct. 2623(Mem) (2018)
Decision Date11 June 2018
Docket NumberNo. 17–1136.,17–1136.
Parties The PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al., petitioners, v. THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, et al.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Vonrosenberg v. Lawrence
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • September 19, 2019
    ...806 S.E.2d 82, 111 (2017), reh'g denied (Nov. 17, 2017), cert. denied sub nom. Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of S.C. v. The Episcopal Church , ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2623, 201 L.Ed.2d 1027 (2018).After the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision, this Court allowed TEC and T......
  • Episcopal Church v. Church Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • January 9, 2020
    ...S.C. 211, 265, 806 S.E.2d 82, 111 (2017), reh'g denied (Nov. 17, 2017), cert. denied sub nom. Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of S.C. v. The Episcopal Church, 138 S. Ct. 2623 (2018). That case has since been remitted to the Dorchester County Circuit Court. Also in 2013 TECSC file......
  • Episcopal Church in S.C. v. Church Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • November 18, 2019
    ...S.C. 211, 265, 806 S.E.2d 82, 111 (2017), reh'g denied (Nov. 17, 2017), cert. denied sub nom. Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of S.C. v. The Episcopal Church, 138 S. Ct. 2623 (2018). That case has since been remitted to the Dorchester County Circuit Court. Also in 2013, TECSC fil......
  • Right Reverend Charles G. Vonrosenberg v. Right Reverend Mark J. Lawrence, Civil Action No. 2:13-587-RMG
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • August 23, 2018
    ...S.C. 211, 265, 806 S.E.2d 82, 111 (2017), reh'g denied (Nov. 17, 2017), cert. denied sub nom. Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of S.C. v. The Episcopal Church, 138 S. Ct. 2623 (2018). The court also held that twenty-eight parishes associated with the Diocese held real and personal......