Provencio v. Wenrich
| Docket Number | 32,344 |
| Decision Date | 17 August 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
19 cases
-
Coffey v. United States
...that a doctor generally owes the “patient a duty to properly diagnose his relevant medical conditions.” Provencio v. Wenrich, 150 N.M. 457, 261 P.3d 1089, 1095 (2011). Requiring a doctor to properly diagnose a patient's relevant medical conditions is sufficiently analogous to this scenario ......
-
United Tort Claimants v. Quorum Health Res., LLC (In re Otero Cnty. Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.)
...question of policy is answered by reference to legal precedent, statutes, and other principles of law.” Provencio v. Wenrich, 150 N.M. 457, 261 P.3d 1089, 1094 (2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), overruled on other grounds by Del Sol, 326 P.3d 465 ). Since there is no Ne......
-
Salopek v. Friedman
...first find an actionable duty of care and then define the nature and scope of that duty.Provencio v. Wenrich, 2011–NMSC–036, ¶ 16, 150 N.M. 457, 261 P.3d 1089. {7} It is well established that “a doctor owes a general duty to provide competent care in treating a patient's medical condition.”......
-
Coffey v. United States
...that a doctor generally owes the “patient a duty to properly diagnose his relevant medical conditions.” Provencio v. Wenrich, 150 N.M. 457, 261 P.3d 1089, 1095 (2011). One New Mexico case affirmed a finding of reckless conduct when a business charged with inspecting and repairing amusement ......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
48 Wrongful Birth
...a contraceptive prescription or device. Willis v. Wu, 362 S.C. 146, 153, 607 S.E.2d 63, 66 (S.C. 2004). See also Provencio v. Wenrich, 150 N.M. 457, 261 P.3d 1089 (2011) (wrongful conception is not separate tort but sounds in law of medical negligence). Dotson v. Bernstein, 207 P.3d 911 (Co......
-
Chapter 37 WRONGFUL CONCEPTION/BIRTH/LIFE
...Life: A Recommendation to North Carolina Legislators," 29 Campbell L. Rev. 761, 780-84 (2007).[16] See also Provencio v. Wenrich, 261 P.3d 1089 (N.M. 2011) (wrongful conception is not distinct tort, but sounds in law of medical negligence); Dotson v. Bernstein, 207 P. 3d 911 (Colo. App. 200......
-
A. Definition
...a contraceptive prescription or device. Willis v. Wu, 362 S.C. 146, 153, 607 S.E.2d 63, 66 (S.C. 2004). See also Provencio v. Wenrich, 150 N.M. 457, 261 P.3d 1089 (2011) (wrongful conception is not separate tort but sounds in law of medical negligence). Dotson v. Bernstein, 207 P.3d 911 (Co......
