Providence Philadelphia Dispatch, Inc., B-189961
| Decision Date | 26 May 1978 |
| Docket Number | B-189961 |
| Parties | PROVIDENCE Philadelphia DISPATCH, INC. |
| Court | Comptroller General of the United States |
Rate tenders, issued pursuant to section 22 of the interstate commerce act, 49 U.S.C. Secs. 22, 317(b) (1970), are continuing offers to perform transportation services for stated prices. They are effective until withdrawn by a communication which expressly or by implication notifies the offeree that the offeror no longer intends to Perform. See Ct. Cases cited.
This decision is in response to a letter of August 18, 1977, from Providence Philadelphia Dispatch, Inc. (providence) requesting review of numerous notices of overcharges sent to providence by the general services administration (GSA). Further action by gsa in connection with these overcharges is being held in abeyance pending this review. The review is being made under 49 U.S.C. Sec. 66(b) (supp. V, 1975) and 4 C.F.R. Sec. 53.3 (1977), since gsa has agreed that its action in this case constitutes finality of administrative consideration. See 4 C.F.R. Sec. 53.1 (B)(3) (1977).
Providence is a freight forwarder subject to regulation under part IV of the interstate commerce ACT. Under section 22 of that act, as amended, 49 U.S.C. 22 (1970), made applicable to freight forwarders by section 405 of the act, 49 U.S.C. 1005 (1970) providence submitted to the department of defense (DOD) several offers to transport property at rates less than the forwarder's tariff rates otherwise applicable to DOD shipments.
The offers involved in this case are providence's tender nos 25, 28 and 29. Each contains a schedule of rates, a description of the services and territories covered and numerous conditions and instructions. One of the conditions in each tender requires in part that it May be canceled or modified by written notice of no less than thirty days by either party to the other.
Rate tenders like these are considered to be continuing offers to perform transportation services for stated prices. 43 Comp.Gen. 54, 59 (1963); 39 Id. 352 (1959); 37 Id. 753, 754 (1958). As continuing offers they create in the person to whom the offers are made (the offeree) the power to make a series of separate contracts by a series of independent acceptances, and that power is good until effectively revoked by the person making the offers. Corbin on contracts, section 38; williston on contracts, 3rd ed., section 58; restatement of contracts, section 44.
Gsa's notices of overcharge are based on the application of the rates and charges in tender nos. 25, 28 and 29; providence contends that those tenders have been canceled and that rates in later issued tenders are applicable.
Tender nos. 28 and 29 were issued June 14, 1972, to become effective July 17, 1972. On June 1, 1973, providence issued tender no 31 to cancel tender no. 28 and tender no. 30 to cancel tender no. 29. Both tenders had effective dates of June 4, 1973, and were returned by the military traffic management and terminal service (mtmts) headquarters in Washington because the attempted cancellations or revocations were not in accord with the condition in each tender requiring thirty days written notice of termination or modification.
On August 28, 1973, providence again issued tender nos. 31 and 30 to become effective September 27, 1973; they were returned by mtmts in Washington on September 4, 1973, because of a clerical error - both tenders canceled tender no. 28.
On May 10, 1974, providence issued tender no. 31 to cancel tender no. 28 and tender no. 30 to cancel tender no. 29 to become effective June 10, 1974. The Washington headquarters of mtmts claims that it never received these tenders. Finally, on March 7, 1975, providence issued a blanket supplement canceling 12 tenders, including tender no. 25, tender nos. 30 and 31 to be effective June 4, 1973, and tender nos. 30 and 31, to be effective September 27, 1973. Although the blanket supplement was filed with the interstate commerce commission on March 10, 1975, and with mtmts in bayonne, New Jersey both bayonne and the Washington headquarters of mtmts claim never to have received it.
Gsa notified headquarters, mtmts, of the blanket supplement on May 4, 1977, and of tender nos. 30 and 31 (the issuance to become effective June 10, 1974) on August 24, 1977.
The question presented here is when were the continuing offers in tender nos. 25, 28 and 29 effectively revoked. Providence contends that the offers in tender nos. 28 and 29 were revoked on June 10, 1974, by tender nos. 30 and 31 and that the offer in tender no. 25 was revoked by the blanket supplement, effective April 11, 1975. It argues that by mailing tender nos. 30 and 31 and the blanket supplement, which had the effect of increasing the rates then in effect, tender nos. 25, 28 and 29 were revoked.
Gsa contends that the tenders were not revoked until 1977 because written notice of revocation was not actually received by headquarters, mtmts, until 1977, when gsa notified headquarters, mtmts, of the existence of tender nos. 30 and 31 and the blanket supplement.
It is settled that to be effective the offeror's revocation of an offer must be communicated to the offeree (headquarters, mtmts). United States v. Sabin metal Corporation, 151 F.Supp. 683, 687 (1957), affirmed 253 F.2d 956; corbin on contracts, section 39; williston on contracts, sections 36, 89; restatement of contracts, sections 41, 69; 51 Comp.Gen. 541 (1972).
The general rule is summarized in corbin on contracts, section 39, notice of revocation necessary, pages 165-66, which reads in part:
To continue reading
Request your trial