Prudence Securities Corporation v. Com'r of Int. Rev., 158.
| Decision Date | 30 March 1943 |
| Docket Number | No. 158.,158. |
| Citation | 135 F.2d 340 |
| Parties | PRUDENCE SECURITIES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Lawrence A. Baker and Henry Ravenel, both of Washington, D. C. (Baker, Selby & Ravenel, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.
Samuel O. Clark, Jr., and Sewall Key, both of Washington, D. C., and Victor Brudney, of New York City (Arthur Manella, of Washington, D. C., arguing), for respondent.
Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
The B bonds, accrued interest on which taxpayer seeks to deduct, are owned by a corporation which also owns all taxpayer's stock. A corporation, ordinarily, cannot in a real sense become a creditor of one of its own incorporated departments. The situation here is substantially the same as if the taxpayer were seeking to deduct accrued interest on its own unissued bonds because it had set them aside in an envelope in its vault. While there are perhaps conceivable circumstances in which accruing interest on bonds of a wholly owned subsidiary held by its parent company might be deductible from the subsidiary's gross income, certainly when the government chooses to assail the transaction such a deduction cannot be permitted. Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473, 60 S.Ct. 355, 84 L.Ed. 406.
But, even aside from the parent-subsidiary relation, taxpayer must lose. For here the contingencies, both in form and substance, affecting the future payment of the interest on the B bonds were such that in the taxable year no reasonable person could assume that payment would ever be likely to occur. This is not a case where the unlikelihood of payment is due to the impending bankruptcy of the debtor,2 but one where indeed only events approximating the bankruptcy of the debtor could bring about any reasonable possibility of payment of interest on the B bonds. If ever there was a case where flimsy paper transactions were put forward as a basis for avoidance of tax, this is it.3
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kraft Foods Company v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.
...was merely a department of National Dairy is an unwarranted extension of the dictum appearing in Prudence Securities Corporation v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 1943, 135 F.2d 340, 341, to the effect that "A corporation, ordinarily, cannot in a real sense become a creditor of one of its own incorp......
-
Fahs v. Martin
...tax purposes in view of the fact that there is little or no likelihood that it will ever be paid," and cites Prudence Securities Corp. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 340, as supporting its position. However, in the Prudence case the obligation to pay interest was conditional, and the con......
-
Kraft Foods Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Docket Nos. 4160
...would be made so long as National Dairy should own petitioner's outstanding stock. In Prudence Securities Corporation v. Commissioner, 135 F.2d 340, where the question was as to the accrual of interest on the bonds of a subsidiary corporation standing in the name of its parent, the United S......
-
Guardian Investment Corporation v. Phinney
...and indeterminable as the other. Both are future events which must occur before contingency is vitiated. In Prudence Securities v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 1943, 135 F.2d 340, 341, a corporation issued Series B bonds, on which no interest was due until after default and after all Series A bond......
-
Interest deductions for bankrupt corporations.
...and no legal obligation could arise under the agreement until the occurrence of that contingency) and Prudence Securities Corp., 135 F2d 340 (2d Cir. 1943) (a taxpayer was denied a deduction on accrued interest from bonds because the interest and principal were to be paid only in the unlike......