Prudential Lines Inc., In re

Citation928 F.2d 565
Decision Date20 March 1991
Docket NumberD,1131,Nos. 1023,s. 1023
Parties-972, 59 USLW 2590, 92-2 USTC P 50,491, 24 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1503, 21 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 838, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,863 In re PRUDENTIAL LINES INC., Debtor. The OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS and Cold Spring Shipping, L.P., Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. PSS STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee. ockets 90-5063, 90-5073.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)

W. Bruce Johnson, New York City (Richard O'Toole, Joanne Wilson, and Battle Fowler, New York City, on the brief), for appellant, cross-appellee PSS S.S. Co., Inc.

Max O. Truitt, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington, D.C., Allan L. Gropper, and White & Case, New York City, on the brief), for appellees, cross-appellants Cold Spring Shipping, L.P. and The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

Before TIMBERS, NEWMAN and ALTIMARI, Circuit Judges.

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Appellant/cross-appellee PSS Steamship Company, Inc. (PSS) appeals from an order entered September 28, 1990, in the Southern District of New York, Robert P. Patterson, District Judge, affirming an order of the bankruptcy court that permanently enjoined it from taking a worthless stock deduction on its 1988 federal income tax return with respect to its bankrupt subsidiary Prudential Lines, Inc. (PLI), since that would have adversely affected PLI's ability to carryforward its net operating loss (NOL) to offset future income.

On appeal, PSS contends that (1) the NOL generated by PLI was not property of PLI's estate within the meaning of Sec. 541 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (2) the bankruptcy court erred in enjoining PSS from taking a worthless stock deduction on its 1988 federal income tax return as violative of the automatic stay. On cross-appeal, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (Creditors' Committee) and Cold Spring Shipping, L.P. (Cold Spring) contend that the bankruptcy court erred in denying relief based on a violation of PSS' fiduciary duty to PLI.

Since we agree with Judge Patterson's excellent district court opinion and for the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

I.

We shall summarize only those facts and prior proceedings believed necessary to an understanding of the issues raised on appeal.

At all times relevant to this appeal, PLI was a wholly owned subsidiary of PSS that provided United States flag shipping between ports in Europe and the Black Sea. Spyros S. Skouras, Sr. is chief executive officer and a director of PSS, and was Chairman and President of PLI until his resignation in November 1989. Spyros S. Skouras, Jr. was Vice President, General Manager, and a director of PLI. In addition, Skouras, Jr. has participated in the financial and tax affairs of PSS since 1986. In that capacity, he consults with PSS' tax counsel and accountants and relays information to his father.

PSS and PLI, along with two other affiliated entities have filed consolidated tax returns since 1976 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 1501 et seq. (1988). In 1988, these entities had a combined NOL of $75 million available to be offset against income. Of that amount, $74 million was attributable to PLI's pre-bankruptcy operations. NOLs are tax deductible and may be carried back and applied against income in previous years (carryback), or carried forward and applied against income in subsequent years (carryforward). 26 U.S.C. Sec. 172 (1988).

On September 12, 1986, an involuntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code was filed against PLI. Soon thereafter, PLI consented to an order for relief. The Creditors' Committee was appointed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1102 (1988) to represent the interests of PLI's unsecured creditors. Cold Spring purchased a participation interest in the unsecured claim of the United States Maritime Administration (MARAD).

In the summer of 1988, Skouras, Sr. and Skouras, Jr. began to formulate a plan for reorganization on behalf of PLI (the "PLI plan"). In connection with that plan, they prepared a term sheet dated August 4, 1988, which indicated that, under the PLI plan, the Skouras family would retain control of PLI and a NOL carryforward of $74 million would be available to offset future income of the reorganized company.

In February 1989, PSS was informed by tax counsel and by its accountants that it could take a $38.9 million worthless stock deduction in connection with its PLI stock on its 1988 federal income tax return. If PSS took that action, it would effectively eliminate the value of the NOL to PLI. Later that month, PLI filed a plan for reorganization with the bankruptcy court. Under that plan, Skouras, Jr. would retain a 75 percent interest in the reorganized company and serve as President. Skouras, Sr. would serve as Chairman of the reorganized company. The disclosure statement accompanying the PLI plan contemplated the availability of PLI's NOL to offset future income of the reorganized company.

In July 1989, PSS' accountants prepared a draft federal income tax return for 1988 that reflected a worthless stock deduction in connection with the PLI stock. The following month PLI filed an amended plan of reorganization. The disclosure statement accompanying the amended PLI plan still reflected the availability of the NOL carryforward to the reorganized company. It did not mention the possibility of PSS taking a worthless stock deduction on its 1988 federal income tax return.

The PLI plan failed to win the support of the creditors. On September 11, 1989, the Creditors' Committee and Cold Spring filed a draft of a joint plan for reorganization (creditors' plan). That plan provided for new management of the reorganized company and provided for no distributions to the Skouras family. The PLI stock owned by the Skouras family was to be cancelled. Like PLI's plan, it also contemplated a carryforward of PLI's $74 million NOL. In an objection to this plan, filed September 19, 1989, PSS announced for the first time its intention to take a worthless stock deduction in the amount of $38.9 million in connection with its PLI stock on its 1988 tax return.

Skouras, Jr. attended three meetings with officials of MARAD, the unsecured creditor holding the largest single claim against PLI, to urge them to support the PLI plan and reject the creditors' plan. At one of these meetings, Skouras, Jr. provided MARAD with a written comparison of the two plans that described the NOL as preserved under the PLI plan and uncertain under the creditors' plan. Skouras, Jr. informed MARAD that PSS might take a worthless stock deduction on its 1988 tax return, which would limit any NOL available to a reorganized PLI.

On October 10, 1989, counsel for PLI met with counsel for the Creditors' Committee and Cold Spring. At that meeting counsel for PLI broached the subject of personal releases in favor of Skouras, Sr. and Skouras, Jr. in the event the creditors' plan was confirmed. The Creditors' Committee and Cold Spring sought assurances that PSS would not take the worthless stock deduction. PSS agreed, subject to revocation by written notice, that it would not take the deduction while negotiations continued.

On November 6, 1989, after the negotiations failed, PSS informed Cold Spring by letter that it reserved the right to take the worthless stock deduction. On the following day Skouras, Jr. met with officials at MARAD and presented them with a copy of the letter. He told them that he did not know whether PSS actually intended to take the worthless stock deduction on its 1988 federal income tax return.

PLI rejected the request of the Creditors' Committee and Cold Spring to take steps to prevent PSS from taking the worthless stock deduction. Skouras, Sr. resigned from his positions with PLI, effective November 3, 1989, after PSS decided to take the worthless stock deduction on its 1988 tax return.

On November 13, 1989, the Creditors' Committee and Cold Spring commenced an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court seeking to have PSS preliminarily and permanently enjoined from taking the worthless stock deduction on its 1988 tax return. Count one of the complaint alleged that taking the worthless stock deduction on its 1988 tax return would amount to a breach of PSS' fiduciary duty to PLI. Count two alleged that PSS was using the threat of the worthless stock deduction only to interfere with the creditors' plan to reorganize PLI. Count three alleged that the NOL attributable to PLI was property of PLI's bankruptcy estate and that taking the worthless stock deduction would violate the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code.

On November 21, 1989, the bankruptcy court held a hearing on plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. At the conclusion of the hearing, the bankruptcy court denied relief on counts one and two, holding that there was a legitimate business purpose for taking the worthless stock deduction and that the business judgment rule precluded further review of the propriety of that decision. On December 4, 1989, the bankruptcy court granted preliminary injunctive relief on count three. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. PSS S.S. Co., Inc. (In re Prudential Lines, Inc.), 107 B.R. 832 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1989). The bankruptcy court held that the NOL generated by PLI was property of PLI's bankruptcy estate and that the worthless stock deduction was an attempt to exercise control over that property in violation of the automatic stay. On December 19, 1989, the bankruptcy court permanently enjoined PSS from taking the worthless stock deduction on its 1988 tax return. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. PSS S.S. Co., Inc. (In re Prudential Lines, Inc.), 114 B.R. 27 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1989). The creditors' plan for reorganization was confirmed on December 15, 1989. PSS has not yet filed its 1988 tax return.

PSS appealed from the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
145 cases
  • Prudential Lines Inc., In re
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 5 October 1998
  • In re Catholic Bishop of Spokane
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Washington
    • 26 August 2005
    ... ... Named non-parish defendants Catholic Charities, Inc., Morning Star Boys Ranch, Inc., Catholic Cemeteries, Inc. d/b/a Holy Cross Cemetery, St. Joseph ... In re Golden Plan of California, Inc., 37 B.R. 167 (Bankr.E.D.Cal.1984); In re Prudential Lines, Inc., 928 F.2d 565 (2nd Cir.1991). This adversary proceeding requires interpretation and ... ...
  • Arrowsmith v. United States (In re Health Diagnostic Lab., Inc.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 6 December 2017
    ... ... Walterman ( In re Walterman Implement, Inc. ), No. 05-07284, 2006 WL 1562401 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa May 22, 2006) ; Guinn v. Lines ( In re TransLines West, Inc. ), 203 B.R. 653 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). Of these courts, only the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ... " Official Comm. Unsecured Creditors v. PSS Steamship Co. ( In re Prudential Lines Inc. ), 928 F.2d 565, 573 (2d Cir. 1991) (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 95595, at 176 (1977), as reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 6136)). "The ... ...
  • Majestic Star Casino, LLC v. Barden Dev., Inc. (In re Majestic Star Casino, LLC)
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 21 May 2013
    ... ... findings of fact for clear error and exercise plenary review over the ... legal determinations. In re Kiwi Int'l Air Lines, Inc., 344 F.3d 311, 316 (3d Cir.2003) (citing In re Woskob, 305 F.3d 177, 181 (3d Cir.2002); In re Cont'l Airlines, 125 F.3d 120, 128 (3d ... It involves both constitutional limitations on federal-court jurisdiction and prudential limitations on its exercise. Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975). One of those prudential limits demands that ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
  • Brad B. Erens, Scott J. Friedman & Kelly M. Mayerfeld, Bankrupt Subsidiaries: the Challenges to the Parent of Legal Separation
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 25-1, March 2009
    • Invalid date
    ...debtor's estate under predecessor to the Bankruptcy Code); Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. PSS S.S. Co. (In re Prudential Lines), 928 F.2d 565, 572 (2d Cir. 1991) ("The fact that the right to a NOL carryforward is intangible and has not yet been reduced to a tax refund also does no......
  • Fiduciary Duties, Consolidated Returns, and Fairness
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 81, 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...v. PSS S.S. Co., (In re Prudential Lines, Inc.), 107 B.R. 832, 839-40 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989), aff'd, 119 B.R. 430 (S.D.N.Y. 1990), aff'd, 928 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1991); Koscot Interplanetary, Inc. v. Glenn W. Turner Enters., Inc. (In re Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.), 1976-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH)......
  • Status Check: Should the Federal Tax Status of a Disregarded Debtor Be Property of the Estate?
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 39-3, September 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...in the estate, rather than as a limitation.").3. Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. PSS S.S. Co. (In re Prudential Lines, Inc.), 928 F.2d 565, 572 (2d Cir. 1991) (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 95-595, at 176 (1978), as reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 6136) (internal quotation marks omitted);......
  • It's Time to Return to Our Roots: The Bankruptcy Common Law That Governs Insolvent Estates.
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Law Journal Vol. 95 No. 3, September 2021
    • 22 September 2021
    ...(131) Id. at 208. (132) In re Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Mgmt. Corp., 896 F.2d 54, 56 (3d Cir. 1990). (133) Id. at 58. (134) 928 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. (135) Id. at 569 (citations omitted). (136) Id. at 571 (137) Id. at 573. (138) In re BankUnited Financial Corp., 727 F.3d 1100 (11th C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT