Prymas v. City Of New Britain
| Decision Date | 15 September 2010 |
| Parties | Walter J. PRYMAS v. CITY OF NEW BRITAIN et al. |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Harold J. Geragosian, New Britain, in support of the petition.
Irena J. Urbaniak, city attorney, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn.App. 511, 3 A.3d 86 (2010), is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Fiorillo v. City of Hartford
...." (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Prymas v. New Britain , 122 Conn. App. 511, 517, 3 A.3d 86, cert. denied, 298 Conn. 915, 4 A.3d 833 (2010) ; see also Barnard v. Barnard , supra, 214 Conn. at 109–10, 570 A.2d 690 (intention of parties is determined from language used i......
-
Connecticut Interlocal Risk Management Agency v. Silktown Roofing, Inc.
... ... written words ... " Prymas v. New Britain, 122 ... Conn App. 511, 517, 3 A.3d 86, cert. denied, 298 Conn. 915, 4 ... ...
- Sullo Invs., LLC v. Moreau
-
McKeon v. Lennon
...erroneous." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Prymas v. New Britain, 122 Conn. App. 511, 517-18, 3 A.3d 86, cert. denied, 298 Conn. 915, 4 A.3d 833 (2010). "To identify and to apply the appropriate standard of review, we must, therefore, initially determine whether the agreement . . . was......
Request a trial to view additional results