Pryotely v. New York, C. & St. LR Co.
| Decision Date | 07 November 1928 |
| Docket Number | No. 5021.,5021. |
| Citation | 28 F.2d 868 |
| Parties | PRYOTELY v. NEW YORK, C. & ST. L. R. CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Lewis D. Houck, of Cleveland, Ohio (Payer, Minshall, Karch & Kerr, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
W. T. Kinder, of Cleveland, Ohio (Tolles, Hogsett & Ginn, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before DENISON, MOORMAN, and KNAPPEN, Circuit Judges.
The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Company maintained a large ash pit in its yards at Conneaut, Ohio. It also kept water in the pit, into which ashes and cinders from engines were dumped. On the morning of July 26, 1926, Joseph Kirzman's body was found in the pit by the man whose duty it was to take out the ashes and cinders. The administrator of Kirzman brought this suit to recover damages from the railroad company, and, at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, the court directed a verdict for the defendant.
Kirzman was last seen alive about 7 o'clock on the morning of July 26th on Commerce street. A path led from that street into defendant's yards, and passed between a sandhouse and the ash pit, which were about 20 feet apart. There were also railroad tracks in this space. In another part of the yards, but at a point where it could be reached by following this path, defendant maintained an office where it employed workmen. This office could also be reached by other routes. Two days prior to the date in question Kirzman had gone to this office, and, with others, had been told by an employee of the company that no workmen were needed, and to "come some other time." There is evidence to show that it was the purpose of Kirzman, on the morning of the 26th, to go again to the office to seek employment. No one saw him enter the yards of defendant, and no one knows how he approached the pit or got into it. The west half of the pit was cleaned every day, and every other day the full length of it was cleaned. The ashes and cinders, when placed in the pit sank to the bottom. On the morning in question there was a "little scum" on the surface of the water.
We assume, without deciding, that the duty of the railroad company to decedent was such as it owed to one who came upon its premises at its invitation in the usual way to seek employment. The evidence does not show whether there were cars between the pit and the sandhouse on the morning of July 26th; it does show that there was a path between the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Crossno v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis
... ... Railroad, 200 Mo. 377, 98 S.W. 566; Sorenson v ... Railroad, 212 N.W. 273; Arkansas Short Line v ... Bellars, 2 S.W.2d 683; Pryotely v. Railroad, 28 ... F.2d 868; Helring v. Railroad, 54 F.2d 493; ... Murphy v. Murphy, 162 S.E. 901; Railroad Co. v ... Godfrey, 71 Ill. 500; ... ...
- Edwards v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis
-
Lauricella v. United States
...no more than a licensee or perhaps even a trespasser. See Bollinger v. Gotham Garage Co., 2 Cir., 155 F.2d 326; Pryotely v. New York C. & St. L. R. Co., 6 Cir., 28 F.2d 868. Hence recovery in the case at bar must depend upon the libellant's testimony that the first mate told him to go to ha......
-
Paulus v. Corbly
...cited by the Defendant are not persuasive because of critical factual differences from the case at bar. In Pryotely v. New York C & St. L R. Co., 28 F.2d 868 (6th Cir.1928), the defendant maintained a large ash pit at its railroad yard. Joseph Kirzman came to the railroad yard to apply for ......