Pueblo of Jemez v. United States

Docket Number13-2181
Decision Date26 June 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
217 cases
  • Fox v. Pittsburg State Univ.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • June 26, 2017
    ...Ltd., 210 F.3d 1207, 1228 (10th Cir. 2000) ; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a)-(b).69 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).70 Pueblo of Jemez v. United States, 790 F.3d 1143, 1151 (10th Cir. 2015) ("The defense of sovereign immunity is jurisdictional in nature, depriving courts of subject-matter jurisdiction w......
  • United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Okla. v. Barteaux
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Oklahoma
    • September 30, 2020
    ...P. 12(b)(1). Rule 12(b)(1) "allows a court to dismiss a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction." Pueblo of Jemez v. United States , 790 F.3d 1143, 1151 (10th Cir. 2015). "Federal subject matter jurisdiction is elemental ... and its presence must be established in every cause unde......
  • Pueblo of Jemez v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • October 25, 2018
    ...Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has expressly instructed the Court to consider such evidence. See Pueblo of Jemez v. United States, 790 F.3d 1143, 1165 (10th Cir. 2015) ("Whether the Jemez Pueblo can establish that it exercised its right of aboriginal occupancy to these lands in 1860......
  • Pueblo of Jemez v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
    • September 2, 2020
    ...exclusive, and continuous use and occupancy" of the land in question "for a long time." Motion at 3 (citing Pueblo of Jemez v. United States, 790 F. 3d 1143, 1165 (10th Cir. 2015) ). Jemez Pueblo asserts that it "continuously maintained exclusive use and occupancy" of the four discrete area......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • "We Hold the Government to Its Word": How McGirt v. Oklahoma Revives Aboriginal Title.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 131 No. 7, May 2022
    • May 1, 2022
    ...(27.) 1 COHEN'S HANDBOOK OF FEDERAL INDIAN LAW, supra note 21, [section] 15.04[2]. (28.) See, e.g., Pueblo of Jemez v. United States, 790 F.3d 1143, 1166 (10th Cir. 2015) (discussing the Jemez Pueblo's "traditional uses" of the Valles Caldera); Mitchel v. United States, 34 U.S. (9 Pet.) 711......
  • Chapter 1 Five Federal Lands Fundamentals: Brief Answers to Basic Questions on Federal Public Lands
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Public Land Law, Regulation, and Management 2022 (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...its aboriginal title to the area survived a federal grant of the lands to a private owner in 1860. See Pueblo of Jemez v. United States, 790 F.3d 1143, 1147-1150 (10 Cir. 2015).[8] See Carol Raish and Alice M. McSweeney, Land Grants and the U.S. Forest Service, 48 NAT. RESOURCES J. 1039 (20......
  • Utah Law Developments
    • United States
    • Utah State Bar Utah Bar Journal No. 28-5, October 2015
    • October 1, 2015
    ...money or property, ” id. at [26], described a specific type of fraudulent scheme within the statute. Pueblo of Jemez v. United States 790 F.3d 1143, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10955 (10th Cir. June 26, 2015) In a detailed opinion on the nature and history of aboriginal rights, the Tenth Circuit c......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT