Puett v. State
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | WEBB; QUILLIAN, P. J., and McMURRAY |
| Citation | Puett v. State, 147 Ga.App. 300, 248 S.E.2d 560 (Ga. App. 1978) |
| Decision Date | 25 September 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 56567,56567 |
| Parties | PUETT v. The STATE. |
Carr & Beck, Claude S. Beck, Blairsville, for appellant.
V. D. Stockton, Dist. Atty., Michael H. Crawford, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Raymond Douglas Puett appeals his conviction of the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicating beverages, contending principally that the evidence was insufficient and that he should have been granted a directed verdict of not guilty because he was not provided a reasonable opportunity to have a physician or other qualified person of his own choosing administer a chemical test as to his alcoholic content, as provided by Code Ann. § 68A-902.1(a)(3). We reverse.
The record shows that the accused was indeed advised of this right to an independent test by a qualified person of his own choosing, that a telephone conversation was had from the jail by the accused with an attendant at the local hospital in which he was informed that such a test could be made if he would come to the hospital, that the accused so informed the personnel at the jail where he was under arrest, and that those holding him under arrest either refused or in any event failed to take him to the hospital for that purpose.
The law gives one accused of driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages the right to have a chemical analysis of his...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Anstey
...accused is in custody of law enforcement officials who either refuse or fail to allow him to exercise the right?" Puett v. State, 147 Ga.App. 300, 301, 248 S.E.2d 560 (1978). An Arizona court, faced with a prosecutor's argument that the defendant had no right to an independent test unless h......
-
Frazier v. Talbert
...granted to the accused a corresponding duty on the part of law enforcement officers not to deny him that right. Puett v. State , 147 Ga.App. 300, 248 S.E.2d 560, 561 (1978) ; accord State v. Livesay , 941 S.W.2d 63, 66 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996) ("We do not believe that simply suppressing the ......
-
State v. Griffin
...officer' " (State v. Buffington, 189 Ga.App. 800, 801-802, 377 S.E.2d 548). See generally, OCGA § 40-6-392(a)(3); see Puett v. State, 147 Ga.App. 300, 248 S.E.2d 560; compare Grizzle v. State, supra, with State v. Laycock, 151 Ga.App. 145, 259 S.E.2d 150. Apparently no such determination wa......
-
State v. Messner
...and at his own expense. E.g., Gundersen v. Municipality of Anchorage, 762 P.2d 104, 108 (Alaska Ct.App.1988); Puett v. State, 147 Ga.App. 300, 248 S.E.2d 560, 561 (1978). It is commonly stated that there is no statutory right to police assistance in obtaining an independent test. E.g., Comm......