Puglia v. Cotter, No. 127
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 450 F.2d 1362 |
| Parties | Michael PUGLIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The Honorable John P. COTTER et al., Defendant-Appellees. |
| Docket Number | No. 127,Docket 71-1602. |
| Decision Date | 27 September 1971 |
450 F.2d 1362 (1971)
Michael PUGLIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The Honorable John P. COTTER et al., Defendant-Appellees.
No. 127, Docket 71-1602.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued September 27, 1971.
Decided September 27, 1971.
Joseph F. Trotta, New Haven, Conn. (Trotta, Trotta & Trotta, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for appellant.
Robert L. Hirtle, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn. (Robert K. Killian, Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for appellees.
Before LUMBARD, MANSFIELD and OAKES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm in open court on the opinion of Judge Zampano, 333 F.Supp. 940 (D.Conn.1971), except that Judge Oakes limits his concurrence to non-constitutional grounds.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 practice notes
-
State v. Moynahan
...1406; see also Puglia v. Cotter, 333 F.Supp. 940 (D.Conn.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1073, 92 S.Ct. 1492, 31 L.Ed.2d 806, affirmed, 2 Cir., 450 F.2d 1362. The further claim that the inquiry is a critical stage of a proceeding requiring the presence of counsel under the Miranda rule is without......
-
Moynahan v. Manson, Civil No. H-218.
...at 562-63 & n.26 (2d ed. 1972). 33 Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 54-47 (1976 Supp.). 34 Puglia v. Cotter, 333 F.Supp. 940 (D.Conn.), aff'd mem., 450 F.2d 1362 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1073, 92 S.Ct. 1492, 31 L.Ed.2d 806 (1972); Salvaggio v. Cotter, 324 F.Supp. 681 (D.Conn.), aff'd mem.......
2 cases
-
State v. Moynahan
...1406; see also Puglia v. Cotter, 333 F.Supp. 940 (D.Conn.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1073, 92 S.Ct. 1492, 31 L.Ed.2d 806, affirmed, 2 Cir., 450 F.2d 1362. The further claim that the inquiry is a critical stage of a proceeding requiring the presence of counsel under the Miranda rule is without......
-
Moynahan v. Manson, Civil No. H-218.
...at 562-63 & n.26 (2d ed. 1972). 33 Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 54-47 (1976 Supp.). 34 Puglia v. Cotter, 333 F.Supp. 940 (D.Conn.), aff'd mem., 450 F.2d 1362 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1073, 92 S.Ct. 1492, 31 L.Ed.2d 806 (1972); Salvaggio v. Cotter, 324 F.Supp. 681 (D.Conn.), aff'd mem.......