Purer v. U.S., 88-5870
Decision Date | 04 April 1989 |
Docket Number | No. 88-5870,88-5870 |
Citation | 872 F.2d 277 |
Parties | -5194, 89-1 USTC P 9264 Phillip PURER; Winifred Purer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Willard D. Horwich, Horwich & Main, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Barbara I. Hodges, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
In this appeal from the district court's denial of a claim for refund of allegedly overpaid income taxes, the appellants contend that the Internal Revenue Service misinterpreted a statute that changed the manner in which interest on deficiencies was calculated, and was estopped from claiming a portion of the accumulated interest on the appellants' tax deficiency. We review de novo, see First American Title Ins. Co. v. United States, 848 F.2d 969, 970 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm.
Prior to January 1, 1983, the Internal Revenue Service imposed simple statutory interest on unpaid taxes; after December 31, 1982, interest on tax deficiencies was to be determined by reference to a floating rate and compounded daily. See 26 U.S.C. Secs. 6601(a); 6621; 6622(a). The appellants argue that the above change applies only to the principal due on pre-1983 tax deficiencies and not to any accumulated interest. This position is without merit.
There is nothing in any of the above statutes which supports the appellants' argument. Similarly, the effective date provision of Pub.L. No. 97-248, Sec. 344(c), 96 Stat. 635 (1982), which says that "[t]he amendments made by this section shall apply to interest accruing after December 31, 1982," does not say that the new method of calculating interest will apply only to pre-1983 principal. Indeed, the legislative history of section 6622 directly contradicts the appellants' interpretation. See, e.g., Conf.Rep., H.R.Rep. No. 760, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 595-96, reprinted in 1982 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 781, 1367-68 ( ). Accord, see Union Pacific R.R. Co. v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 177, 179-80 (1986); United States v. Wodtke, 627 F.Supp. 1034, 1043 (N.D.Iowa 1985); Mertens Law of Fed. Income Tax., Comm. Sec. 6622:1 () (footnote omitted). See also, 26 C.F.R. Sec. 301.6622-1(c)(1) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Ford
...and penalties accruing on tax liabilities. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601(a), 6621, 6622(a), 5554; 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c); Purer v. United States, 872 F.2d 277, 277 (9th Cir. 1989) ("[A]fter December 31, 1982, interest on tax deficiencies was to be determined by reference to a floating rate and compoun......
-
River City Ranches #1 Ltd. v. Commissioner
...the public's interest will not suffer undue damage by imposition of the liability.'" Purer v. United States [89-1 USTC ¶ 9264], 872 F.2d 277, 278 (9th Cir. 1989) (quoting Wagner v. Director, Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 847 F.2d 515, 519 (9th Cir. 1988)). Affirmative misconduct requires "on......
-
RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. U.S., 91-8248
...report sets forth the final agreement of both houses it is entitled to great weight in determining congressional intent."); Purer v. U.S., 872 F.2d 277 (9th Cir.1989) (relying on the conference report and the treasury B. Joint Committee Report The joint committee report, like the conference......
-
Miller v. Commissioner
...the public's interest will not suffer undue damage by imposition of the liability.'" Purer v. United States [89-1 USTC ¶ 9264], 872 F.2d 277, 278 (9th Cir. 1989) (quoting Wagner v. Director, Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 847 F.2d 515, 519 (9th Cir. 1988)). Affirmative misconduct requires "on......