Purvis v. State

Decision Date11 August 2005
Citation841 N.E.2d 180,829 N.E.2d 572
PartiesPURVIS v. STATE.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

Transfer denied.

All Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Koenig v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 30 Octubre 2009
    ...the admission of evidence may be harmless when the evidence is merely cumulative of other properly admitted evidence. Purvis v. State, 829 N.E.2d 572, 585 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied 841 N.E.2d 180 (Ind.2005), cert. denied sub nom. Purvis v. Indiana, 547 U.S. 1026, 126 S.Ct. 1580, 164 ......
  • In re N.D.C., SC 88163.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 12 Junio 2007
    ...Cir.2004) (statements to co-conspirators not testimonial). 19. Herrera-Vega v. State, 888 So.2d 66 (Fla.Ct. App.2004); Purvis v. State, 829 N.E.2d 572 (Ind.App.2005); State v. Van Leonard, 910 So.2d 977 (La.App.2005); State v. Blackstock, 165 N.C.App. 50, 598 S.E.2d 412 (2004); State v. Sha......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 4 Agosto 2008
    ...out her phone number, and requiring her to check in with him. Moreover, some of this evidence was cumulative.5 See Purvis v. State, 829 N.E.2d 572, 585 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) ("Improper admission of evidence is harmless error when the erroneously admitted evidence is merely cumulative of other e......
  • Sandefur v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 8 Abril 2011
    ...value from which a reasonable trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Purvis v. State, 829 N.E.2d 572, 587 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied, cert. denied. In order to convict Sandefur, the State had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he: (1) know......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT