Quinones v. Coral Rock, Inc.
Decision Date | 29 February 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 71--1429,71--1429 |
Citation | 258 So. 2d 485 |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Parties | Virgilio QUINONES, Petitioner, v. CORAL ROCK, INC., a Delaware corporation, individually and as owner of the vessels Lobster Farms III, Lobster Farms IV, Coral Rock I, and Coral Rock II; Lobster Farms, Inc., a Delaware corporation, individually and as owner of the vessels, Lobster Farms I and Lobster Farms II, Respondents. |
Colson & Hicks, Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, for petitioner.
Smathers & Thompson and John H. Schulte, Miami, for respondents.
Before SWANN, C.J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Petitioner, Virgilio Quinones, seeks a writ of common law certiorari under rule 4.5, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., to review a circuit court order recorded November 30, 1971 from which a petition for rehearing was denied.The order appealed denied leave to petitioner, plaintiff below, to file a fourth amended complaint adding Fireman's Insurance Company as a defendant.
Petitioner filed suit for maritime personal injuries.The original defendants were the owners of the vessels involved, which were insured under a 'Protection and Indemnity' maritime insurance policy.
The court below impliedly held that the policy, by its terms, only became applicable after defendantCoral Rock, Inc. paid an adverse judgment, so that the insurance company was not a real party in interest.The petition alleges and we agree that the decision below conflicts with DaCosta v. General Guaranty Insurance Company, Fla.1969, 226 So.2d 104 and the insurance joinder cases of Shingleton v. Bussey, Fla.1969, 223 So.2d 713, Beta Eta House Corporation, Inc. of Tallahassee v. Gregory, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 163, andStecher v. Pomeroy, Fla.1971, 253 So.2d 421, thereby departing from the...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Steelmet, Inc. v. Caribe Towing Corp.
...under a motor vehicle liability policy could maintain a direct action against the insurer. Also we cited Quinones v. Coral Rock, Inc., 258 So.2d 485, 486 (Fla. 3d D.C.A.1972), in which the Florida Third District Court of Appeal held that Shingleton and following cases permitted joinder, in ......
-
Steelmet, Inc. v. Caribe Towing Corp.
...of action against an insurer in favor of members of the public injured through the acts of an insured"); Quinones v. Coral Rock, Inc., 258 So.2d 485, 486 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1972) (application of rule to P & I policy). Steelmet is entitled to pursue its action against the insurers on The insur......
-
Weeks v. Beryl Shipping, Inc.
...been interpreted to permit the joinder of a maritime insurer in a suit for maritime personal injuries. 5 See Quinones v. Coral Rock, Inc., 258 So.2d 485, 486 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1972). The Supreme Court of Florida has held, however, that Shingleton permits joinder only in cases involving "liab......
-
Osborne v. Elizabeth Massey Inv. Corp.
...We can see absolutely no reason to differentiate between the two for purposes of this issue. We agree with Quinones v. Coral Rock, Inc., 258 So.2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), wherein the court expressly held that under Shingleton v. Bussey a marine insurer could be joined as a defendant by a pl......