R.J.T. Food & Rest., LLC v. Rescap Liquidating Trust

Decision Date19 August 2020
Docket NumberIndex No. 615307/16,2018–11574
Citation186 A.D.3d 768,127 N.Y.S.3d 270 (Mem)
Parties R.J.T. FOOD AND RESTAURANT, LLC, et al., Respondents, v. RESCAP LIQUIDATING TRUST, etc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Houser & Allison, APC, New York, N.Y. (Jordan W. Schur of counsel), for appellant.

Butler, Fitzgerald, Fiveson & McCarthy, A Professional Corporation, New York, N.Y. (David K. Fiveson and Claudia G. Jaffe of counsel), for respondents.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action pursuant to RPAPL 1501(4) to cancel and discharge of record certain mortgages, the defendant ResCap Liquidating Trust appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Vincent J. Martorana, J.), dated September 17, 2018. The order granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action and denied the cross motion of the defendant ResCap Liquidating Trust for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs gave a mortgage on certain real property (hereinafter the subject mortgage) in favor of a predecessor in interest of the defendant ResCap Liquidating Trust (hereinafter the defendant). An action to foreclose the subject mortgage was commenced in 2005 (hereinafter the 2005 action). A separate action to foreclose the subject mortgage was commenced in 2008 (hereinafter the 2008 action). The 2008 action was discontinued by stipulation, that same year, based on the pendency of the 2005 action. Ultimately, in the 2005 action, a predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs was awarded summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against him, without prejudice, based on lack of standing (see Homecomings Fin., LLC v. Guldi, 108 A.D.3d 506, 969 N.Y.S.2d 470 ).

In 2016, the plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to RPAPL 1501(4) to cancel and discharge of record certain mortgages, including the subject mortgage. The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the first cause of action, seeking to cancel and discharge of record the subject mortgage. The defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it. In an order dated September 17, 2018, the Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs' motion and denied the defendant's cross motion. The defendant appeals.

RPAPL 1501(4) provides, in part, that "[w]here the period allowed by the applicable statute of limitation for the commencement of an action to foreclose a mortgage ... has expired," any person with an estate or interest in the property may maintain an action "to secure the cancellation and discharge of record of such encumbrance, and to adjudge the estate or interest of the plaintiff in such real property to be free therefrom." An action to foreclose a mortgage is subject to a six-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 213[4] ; NMNT Realty Corp. v. Knoxville 2012 Trust, 151 A.D.3d 1068, 1069, 58 N.Y.S.3d 118 ). Even if a mortgage is payable in installments, once a mortgage debt is accelerated, the entire amount is due and the statute of limitations begins to run on the entire debt (see 21st Mtge. Corp. v. Nweke, 165 A.D.3d 616, 618, 85 N.Y.S.3d 127 ; Kashipour v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB, 144 A.D.3d 985, 986, 41 N.Y.S.3d 738 ). "A lender may revoke its election to accelerate the mortgage, but it must do so by an affirmative act of revocation occurring during the six-year statute of limitations period subsequent to the initiation of the prior foreclosure action" ( NMNT Realty Corp. v. Knoxville 2012 Trust, 151 A.D.3d at 1069–1070, 58 N.Y.S.3d 118 ).

Here, the plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the first cause of action pursuant to RPAPL 1501(4) to cancel and discharge of record the subject mortgage by demonstrating that more than six years had passed since the subject mortgage was accelerated by commencement of the 2008 action (see Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Craig, 169 A.D.3d 627, 629, 93...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Pryce v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • 23 Septiembre 2020
    ...Bank USA, N.A., 185 A.D.3d 860, 128 N.Y.S.3d 515 (2d Dept. 2020). See also, R.J.T. Food and Restaurant, LLC v. Rescap Liquidating Trust, 186 A.D.3d 768, 127 N.Y.S.3d 270 (2d Dept. 2020) ; Stewart Title Ins. Co. v. Bank of New York Mellon, 154 A.D.3d 656, 659, 61 N.Y.S.3d 634 (2d Dept. 2017)......
  • Phx. Life Ins. Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 19 Agosto 2020
    ...at the time that they were made in 2012. Since the instant action was not commenced until 2016, these causes of action were time-barred.186 A.D.3d 768 The parties' remaining contentions either need not be reached in light of our determination or are without merit. MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, CHRI......
  • Rodriguez v. Diallo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 19 Agosto 2020
    ...760 ). The plaintiffs failed to do either within the 90–day period. To avoid dismissal of the complaint, the plaintiffs were required to 127 N.Y.S.3d 270 demonstrate a justifiable 186 A.D.3d 771 excuse for the failure to timely abide by the 90–day demand, as well as the existence of a poten......
  • Persaud v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 1 Septiembre 2021
    ...the statute of limitations begins to run on the entire debt" ( 150 N.Y.S.3d 617 R.J.T. Food & Rest., LLC v. ResCap Liquidating Trust , 186 A.D.3d 768, 769, 127 N.Y.S.3d 270 ; see U.S. Bank N.A. v. Lent , 193 A.D.3d 1098, 1100, 147 N.Y.S.3d 619 ; 128 Skillman St. 4A, LLC v. Nationstar Mtge.,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT