Racer v. State, for Use of Rhine
Decision Date | 30 April 1892 |
Docket Number | 16,403 |
Citation | 31 N.E. 81,131 Ind. 393 |
Parties | Racer v. The State, for Use of Rhine, Drainage Commissioner |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Blackford Circuit Court.
Judgment affirmed.
J. N Templer, R. S. Gregory and A. C. Silverburg, for appellant.
W. H Carroll, G. Dean, B. G. Shinn and E. Pierce, for appellee.
The appellant prosecutes this appeal from a decree rendered in a suit brought on the relation of Charles A. Rhine commissioner of drainage, to enforce the collection of an assessment levied to pay the cost of constructing a public ditch. The proceedings for the construction of the ditch were had in the Blackford Circuit Court, and were conducted under the drainage law of 1881, and the amendatory statute of 1883; section 4273, R. S. 1881, et seq.; Elliott's Supp., sections 1175 to 1183. The ditch was ordered to be constructed by the circuit court, the order was so far carried into effect by the execution of contracts, bonds and the like, as well as by the performance of work by the contractor, that six miles of the ditch had been constructed at the time this suit was brought, leaving five miles of the entire line of the ditch to be constructed. The appellant, against whose land an assessment was levied, answered, setting forth the contract for the construction of the ditch, which contract reads as follows:
This contract is made with special reference to the act of the Legislature of this State, entitled "An act concerning drainage," approved April 8th, 1881, and the amendments thereof in chapter 126 of the Acts of 1883, approved March 8th, 1883.
The answer, after setting forth the contract, alleges "That by the terms of said contract with the said Paul for the construction of said ditch, no part of the cost and contract-price for the construction thereof is to be paid until said ditch shall have been constructed according to the plans and specifications, order and judgment of the court in the establishment thereof, and to the satisfaction and acceptance of said court; that said commissioner, long before the commencement of this suit, collected of the benefits so assessed, to wit: In May, 1889, more than $ 1,000, with which money he, as such commissioner, then and there, and long before the commencement of this suit, paid and settled all costs and expenses incident to the establishing of said ditch, as well as those incurred in preparation of reports and expenses which the petitioners incurred in the preparation and presentation of their said petition for the establishment of their said ditch, and all other expenses ordered and directed to be paid by the court by said commissioner, and all expenses of every kind and description connected with the location and establishment of said ditch and prosecution of said work, except the cost of construction agreed upon as set forth in said contract with the said Paul, which amount is not to be paid until said ditch shall have been constructed as therein provided for and in strict conformity with the plans and specifications for the construction of said ditch, as the same were reported by said commissioners, and ordered and adjudged by said court in the establishment thereof; that said commissioner now has in his hands, as such commissioner, so collected by him, a large sum of money, to wit, more than $ 100, after paying and adjusting all costs and expenses incident to the establishment of said ditch and the prosecution of said work as aforesaid, which amount of money is more than will be needed by said commissioner, or necessary in the further prosecution of said work, until the cost of construction as provided for in the said contract with the said Henry C. Paul shall become due and payable; that by the terms of said agreement the said contractor, Paul, is to have said ditch completed by March, 1891.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sims v. Fletcher Sav. & Trust Co.
...Stone Co. v. McCain, 133 Ind. 231, 233, 31 N. E. 956;Matchett v. Cincinnati, etc., Ry. Co., 132 Ind. 334, 31 N. E. 792;Racer v. State, 131 Ind. 393, 401, 31 N. E. 81;Butler v. Thornburg, 131 Ind. 237, 238, 30 N. E. 1073. Section 76 of the Tax Law of 1919, among other things, provides as fol......
-
Duffy v. England
...tenor. [5] It cannot perform a double office. It cannot be good as a denial and also as a plea in confession and avoidance. Racer v. State, 131 Ind. 393, 31 N. E. 81;Nysewander v. Lowman, 124 Ind. 584, 24 N. E. 355, and cases cited. The obvious theory of the pleading is that of confession a......
-
Sims v. Fletcher Savings & Trust Co.
... ... Sims and others, constituting the State Board of Tax ... Commissioners. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants ... appeal ... 956; ... Matchett v. Cincinnati, etc., R. Co ... (1892), 132 Ind. 334, 31 N.E. 792; Racer v ... State (1892), 131 Ind. 393, 401, 31 N.E. 81; ... Butler v. Thornburg (1892), 131 Ind. 237, ... ...
-
Duffy v. England
... ... It ... cannot be good as a denial and also as a plea in confession ... and avoidance. Racer v. State, ex ... rel. (1892), 131 Ind. 393, 31 N.E. 81; ... Nysewander v. Lowman (1890), 124 Ind ... ...