Radatz v. Fed. Nat’l Mortgage Ass’n
| Docket Number | 2014-1126 |
| Decision Date | 23 March 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Hicks v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...a correct judgment for reasons different from those upon which the trial court based its decision"); Radatz v. Fed. Natl. Mtge. Assn. , 145 Ohio St.3d 475, 2016-Ohio-1137, 50 N.E.3d 527, ¶ 1 (affirming for different reasons than those stated by appellate court). Specifically, we conclude th......
-
State ex rel. Ohio Attorney Gen. v. Peterson
...991 (1994) (Resnick, J., concurring).{¶ 21} However, courts use this test when applying federal law. See Radatz v. Fannie Mae , 145 Ohio St.3d 475, 2016-Ohio-1137, 50 N.E.3d 527, ¶ 23, 31 (characterizing the test as "[t]he federal test" when applying federal law). Although Justice Resnick's......
-
Voss v. Quicken Loans LLC
...significant factual differences but finds it unnecessary to review them in light of the binding authority of TransUnion. [9]The language of Radatz that it would be the borrower, as holder of the satisfied but unrecorded mortgage, rather than the purchaser of the property (Plaintiff Voss) wh......