Radio-Television News Directors Ass'n v. F.C.C., RADIO-TELEVISION

Decision Date16 January 1987
Docket NumberNo. 85-1691,RADIO-TELEVISION,85-1691
Citation809 F.2d 860
Parties, 13 Media L. Rep. 2002 NEWS DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, American Legal Foundation, Media Access Project, et al., Henry Geller, et al., American Newspaper Publishers Association, National Bar Association, et al., EUMEDIA, Inc., Democratic National Committee, et al., Westinghouse Broadcasting and Cable, Inc., Black Citizens for a Fair Media, et al., Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, et al., American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organization, American Jewish Congress, Intervenors.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
Robert A. Beizer for Tribune Broadcasting Co., Henry L. Baumann, Steven A. Bookshester for Nat. Ass'n of Broadcasters, Michael H. Bader, John M. Pelkey for Meredith Corporation, Thomas Schattenfield, Mania K. Baghdadi for Nat. Radio Broadcasters Ass'n, Bruce W. Sanford, Washington, D.C., for Society of Professional Journalists, were on the joint brief for petitioners.

Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Robert M. Gurss, J. Clay Smith, Jr., Washington, D.C., and Earle K. Moore, Washington, D.C., were on brief for intervenors, Media Access Project, et al. David W. Danner entered an appearance for intervenors, Media Access Project, et al.

Before SILBERMAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * Senior District Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Intervenors' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, responses thereto, and the oral argument of counsel, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is

ORDERED by the Court that the motion is hereby granted with respect to Petitioners' constitutional challenge to the fairness doctrine. It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that Intervenors' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied with respect to Petitioners' claim that the Commission's failure to institute a rulemaking to eliminate or modify the fairness doctrine was arbitrary and capricious.

The Clerk is directed to schedule the merits of this case for briefing and argument in advance of the Summer recess.

MEMORANDUM

Petitioners seek review of the FCC's 1985 report on the fairness doctrine, Report Concerning General Fairness Obligations of Broadcast Licensees, 102 F.C.C.2d 143 (1985), in which the Commission concluded the fairness doctrine violates the first amendment and no longer serves the public interest but nevertheless declined to institute a rulemaking to eliminate or modify the doctrine. 1 In light of the Report, Petitioners ask this Court to declare the fairness doctrine unconstitutional and the Commission's failure to eliminate it, arbitrary and capricious. Intervenors Henry Geller and Donna Lampert, Media Access Project, et al., and the Democratic National Committee, et al. filed motions to dismiss, arguing we lack jurisdiction to review Petitioners' claims, in particular their challenge to the constitutionality of the fairness doctrine. On March 25, 1986, a motions panel of this Court ordered further briefing on the jurisdictional issue and deferred briefing on the merits pending resolution of the motion to dismiss.

Petitioners argue that "in light of the Commission's finding that the fairness doctrine has a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Meredith Corp. v. F.C.C.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • February 10, 1987
    ...review here, instead preferring we review the constitutionality of the doctrine--and presumably declare it unconstitutional--in RTNDA, the companion case. 7 Intervenors, besides challenging our jurisdiction, urge caution because, as they warn, a ruling on the constitutionality of the fairne......
  • Industrial Safety Equipment Ass'n, Inc. v. EPA, Civ. A. No. 86-1605.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • February 27, 1987
    ...that does not alter legal obligations, is not "agency action" subject to direct appellate review. Radio-Television News Directors Ass'n. v. FCC ("RTNDA"), 809 F.2d 860, 862 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (applying Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (1982)).4 Thus, it appears that where an......
  • Radio-Television News Directors Ass'n v. F.C.C., RADIO-TELEVISION
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • November 3, 1987
    ...concerned with the Court's decision of January 16, 1987, issued as an Order with Memorandum. The Order and Memorandum are reported at 809 F.2d 860 (1987). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it ORDERED, by the Court, that the Order and Memorandum of January 16, 1987 are vacated in their en......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT