Rado v. Zlotnick
| Citation | 75 A.2d 762,5 N.J. 346 |
| Parties | Carl RADO, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Harry ZLOTNICK, et al., Defendants-Respondents. |
| Decision Date | 11 September 1950 |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
See same case below, 7 N.J.Super. 197, 72 A.2d 533.
Marcus & Levy, Paterson, Hyman W. Rosenthal, Newark and Harry Chashin, Bayonne, for the petitioner.
Markley & Broadhurst, Edward A. Markley and Arthur J. Blake, all of Jersey City, for the respondents.
Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Bree v. Jalbert
...1, 205 A.2d 746 (App.Div.1964); but cf. Rado v. Zlotnick, 7 N.J.Super. 197, 72 A.2d 533 (App.Div.1950) , certification denied 5 N.J. 346, 75 A.2d 762 (1950). Defendants also moved to have the lighting issue withdrawn from the jury, urging that as a matter of law the lack of adequate lightin......
-
Benton v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Westfield
...567, 124 A.L.R. 808 (E. & A. 1939); Rado v. Zlotnick, 7 N.J.Super. 197, 199, 72 A.2d 533 (App.Div.1950), certification denied 5 N.J. 346, 75 A.2d 762 (1950). If the reasonably prudent person would not have used the stairway under the circumstances presented or if the injured plaintiff did n......