Rado v. Zlotnick

Decision Date11 September 1950
CitationRado v. Zlotnick, 75 A.2d 762, 5 N.J. 346 (N.J. 1950)
PartiesCarl RADO, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Harry ZLOTNICK, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

See same case below, 7 N.J.Super. 197, 72 A.2d 533.

Marcus & Levy, Paterson, Hyman W. Rosenthal, Newark and Harry Chashin, Bayonne, for the petitioner.

Markley & Broadhurst, Edward A. Markley and Arthur J. Blake, all of Jersey City, for the respondents.

Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Bree v. Jalbert
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • April 27, 1965
    ...1, 205 A.2d 746 (App.Div.1964); but cf. Rado v. Zlotnick, 7 N.J.Super. 197, 72 A.2d 533 (App.Div.1950) , certification denied 5 N.J. 346, 75 A.2d 762 (1950). Defendants also moved to have the lighting issue withdrawn from the jury, urging that as a matter of law the lack of adequate lightin......
  • Benton v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Westfield
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • April 28, 1958
    ...567, 124 A.L.R. 808 (E. & A. 1939); Rado v. Zlotnick, 7 N.J.Super. 197, 199, 72 A.2d 533 (App.Div.1950), certification denied 5 N.J. 346, 75 A.2d 762 (1950). If the reasonably prudent person would not have used the stairway under the circumstances presented or if the injured plaintiff did n......