Ragan v. Kelly

Decision Date04 February 1942
Docket Number3.
Citation24 A.2d 289,180 Md. 324
PartiesRAGAN v. KELLY et al.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City; Eugene O'Dunne, Judge.

Suit by John C. Kelly and others against Agnes C. Ragan, Mary Ragan John A. Brady, administrator of the estate of Edward F Kelly, deceased, and the Carrollton Bank of Baltimore City for a decree holding that writing authorizing bank to enter on bank account of Edward F. Kelly, deceased, the name of Agnes C. Ragan as joint owner was void, that balance remaining in account be declared to belong to the estate of Edward F. Kelly, deceased, that Agnes C. Ragan be required to account for all sums withdrawn from account, except such sums as were used in payment of hospital and medical expenses of Edward F. Kelly, deceased, and that administrator be required to administer estate of Edward F. Kelly, deceased, under jurisdiction of circuit court. From an adverse decree, Agnes C. Ragan appeals.

Decree affirmed in part and reversed in part, and cause remanded for decree in accordance with opinion.

Paul R. Hassencamp, of Baltimore, for appellant.

Willis R. Johes, of Baltimore, for appellees.

Before BOND, C.J., and SLOAN, DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, FORSYTHE, and MARBURY, JJ.

FORSYTHE, Judge.

On September 14, 1937, Edward F. Kelly, late of Baltimore City died at Bon Secours Hospital in Baltimore City. His only heirs and next of kin were a sister Mary Ragan, her daughter Agnes C. Ragan, and John C. Kelly, Edward F. Kelly, Ida Sjolander, and Viola Smith, children of a deceased brother.

At the time of his death Mr. Kelly was seventy-nine years old. Prior to his death he had on deposit at the Carrollton Bank of Baltimore, in his individual name, and subject to his individual order, the sum of Two Thousand and Thirty-Five Dollars and Sixty-Three cents. On August 9, 1937, Mr. Kelly signed an order authorizing the said bank to enter on his account the name of his niece Agnes C. Ragan, so that the account then would stand as 'Edward F. Kelly in trust for self and Agnes C. Ragan, joint owners, subject to order of either, the balance at death of either to belong to survivor.' On the same day the bank made the entry in accordance with the order.

Immediately, Agnes C. Ragan made a withdrawal of Five Hundred Dollars, and later One Thousand Dollars, from the account, a part of which was expended by her while Mr. Kelly was in the hospital, for hospital bills and nursing, and a part was expended after his death for clothing, burial expenses and the doctor's bill.

On March 11, 1938, a bill of complaint was filed in Circuit Court No. 2. of Baltimore City, by John C. Kelly, Edward F. Kelly, Ida Sjolander and Viola Smith against Agnes C. Ragan, Mary Ragan, John A. Brady, administrator of the estate of Edward F. Kelly, deceased, and the Carrollton Bank of Baltimore City.

The bill sought a decree, (1) that the paper-writing bearing the signature of Edward F. Kelly delivered to the Carrollton Bank on August 9, 1937, directing that his account be changed to read 'Edward F. Kelly in trust until withdrawn thereof for self and Agnes C. Ragan, joint owners, subject to withdrawal by either, the balance at death of either to belong to the survivor' be declared invalid, void and of no effect; (2) that the balance of Five Hundred and Forty-Three Dollars and Thirty-one Cents remaining on deposit in the Carrollton Bank be declared to belong to the estate of Edward F. Kelly, deceased; (3) that Agnes C. Ragan be required to account to the estate of Edward F. Kelly for all sums withdrawn from the aforesaid bank, except such sums as were used by her for the payment of the reasonable hospital and medical expenses of the said Edward F. Kelly during his lifetime; and (4) that the said administrator be required to administer the estate of Edward F. Kelly under the jurisdiction of Circuit Court No. 2. of Baltimore City.

After answers, testimony was heard and the Court, on June 25, 1941, passed a decree directing Agnes C. Ragan 'to account to John A. Brady, Administrator of the Estate of Edward F. Kelly, deceased, for the sum of Twelve Hundred and Eleven Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents as representing the difference between the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars which she withdrew from a deposit in The Carrollton Bank of Baltimore belonging to the said Edward F. Kelly and the sum of Two Hundred and Eighty-Eight Dollars and Thirty-five Cents which the said Agnes Ragan disbursed on the account of the said Edward F. Kelly prior to his death on September 14, 1937, to the end that the said sum of Twelve Hundred and Eleven Dollars and Sixty-five Cents may be administered in the Orphans' Court of Baltimore City in accordance with law.' The decree also directed the Carrollton Bank to pay to the said administrator the sum of Five Hundred and Seventy-Six Dollars and Fifty-Six Cents representing the present balance on deposit in said bank belonging to the estate of the said Edward F. Kelly, deceased. From that decree this appeal was entered.

The testimony contained in the Record discloses that on August 1, 1937, Mr. Kelly became seriously ill and entered Bon Secours Hospital in Baltimore City. His condition necessitated a serious major operation, which was performed on August 7, 1937. Mr. Kelly died on September 14, 1937. On August 9, 1937, two days after the operation, and while Mr. Kelly was 'a very sick man,' his niece Agnes C. Ragan had him sign an order on the Carrollton Bank, in which he had a deposit, at that time of Two Thousand and Thirty-Five Dollars and Sixty-Three Cents, to change the entry on his account. On the same day, August 9, 1937, Agnes Ragan took the order to the bank, and the entry changed to its present form as follows: 'Edward F. Kelly in trust for self and Agnes C. Ragan joint owners, subject to order of either, the balance at death of either to belong to survivor.'

The circumstances surrounding the actual signing of the order by Mr. Kelly were told by the witness Danko, who occupied the room, with Mr. Kelly, on the day the order was signed. Danko testified Agnes Ragan came into the room about 10 o'clock in the morning, and Mr. Kelly 'asked her if she had brought the papers'; she produced the papers and Mr. Kelly 'asked for his glasses and took the paper and read it over and asked where he should sign.' The witness described the paper as being of 'legal size' and was emphatic in stating that it was not the cards shown him at the trial. Also, he said he saw no other papers signed. This witness heard no discussion about the papers, either before, or at the time they were signed, and did not know the nature of the transaction. On that day, Danko said Mr. Kelly told him he was 'in great pain', but it was the witness' opinion that Mr. Kelly knew what he was doing.

A nurse, Miss Gonley, was called in to witness Mr. Kelly's signature. The card was signed in her presence. She said, 'when he signed the card he seemed to know what he was doing.' The witness heard no discussion about the card, but knew that Mr. Kelly 'suffered a good deal.' Like Danko, Miss Gonley, did not know the nature of the transaction. There was no other testimony concerning the actual signing of the card, or that would throw any light on anything that had transpired between Mr. Kelly and Agnes Ragan prior to the signing of the card.

The bank teller, Stiemly, testified Agnes Ragan came to the bank on the morning of August 9th, and presented Mr. Kelly's bank book and told him her uncle 'was quite seriously ill in the hospital and she needed money to pay his hospital bills and doctor bills and wanted to know just how it could be arranged that she could make the withdrawals.' He explained to Miss Ragan the procedure required by the bank, and gave her the card to be signed by Mr. Kelly. Miss Ragan took the card and later returned with Mr. Kelly's signature on it. The account then was entered in accordance with the card.

Mrs. Ida M. Sjolander, a niece of Mr. Kelly, and one of the plaintiffs in the bill, testified she had a conversation with Agnes Ragan on the night of August 8th (the night before the card was signed), as follows: 'I asked Agnes if she had taken care of Uncle Eddie's affairs and she said, 'Why'? I said, 'Have you his bank book?' And she said 'Yes'. And she said 'How did you know he had any money?' And I said 'Well I have known it for some time', And I said, 'Whose name is the bank book in'? And she said, 'It is in Uncle Eddie's name'. She said 'How could I get my name on it'? And I said, 'Owing to his condition tonight, it is impossible for you to do that', and the matter was dropped and that was all that was said.' The witness also said later: 'I asked what bank it was on and she refused to tell me and I asked how much was on deposit and she refused to tell me.'

In reference to the transaction with the bank Agnes C. Ragan testified: 'I went to the bank and told them this was my Uncle's book and he wanted my name put on the book just the same as the book I carried which was from the Metropolitan Bank.' It was stipulated that the book she carried was in the name of the witness and her mother with the same provision for survivorship as now appears on Mr Kelly's book. Agnes Ragan further testified, Mr. Kelly's bank book was given to her by one of the Sisters of the hospital, together with keys and cash money. On cross-examination Miss Ragan was asked 'You didn't question that it was Mr. Kelly's money and you intended to spend it for him to the extent necessary, is that right?' A. 'Yes.' On the 9th of August, after the transaction of changing the entry on the bank book was completed, Miss Ragan drew out Five Hundred Dollars, and on August 24th, One Thousand Dollars. Both amounts were deposited in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Bradford v. Eutaw Sav. Bank of Baltimore City
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • March 14, 1946
    ...A.L.R. 1334; Dougherty v. Dougherty, 175 Md. 441, 2 A.2d 433; Hopkins Place Savings Bank v. Holser, 175 Md. 481, 2 A.2d 639; Ragan v. Kelly, 180 Md. 324, 24 A.2d 289; Mushaw v. Mushaw, 183 Md. 511, 39 A.2d 465. A resume of the effect of the earlier cases was made by this Court in the case o......
  • Collier v. Benjes
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • April 14, 1950
    ...v. Smith, 154 Md. 660, 665, 141 A. 405.' See also Edwards v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 1939, 102 F.2d 757. In the case of Ragan v. Kelly, 180 Md. 324, 24 A.2d 289, 291, the account read: 'Edward F. Kelly in trust [until withdrawal thereof] for self and Agnes C. Ragan, joint owners, subject to ......
  • North East Ins. Co. v. Concord General Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • August 7, 1981
    ...an obligation to pay or interest to protect is not a volunteer and may be subrogated to the rights of the payee. Ragan v. Kelly, 180 Md. 324, 325, 24 A.2d 289, 295 (1942); Boney v. Central Mutual Ins. Co., supra 213 N.C. at 567, 197 S.E. at 126; North-West Ins. Co. v. Western Pacific Ins. C......
  • Grimm v. Virts
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • November 14, 1947
    ... ... Such an entry, unexplained, is a declaration of trust ... Milholland v. Whalen, 89 Md. 212, 43 A. 43, 44 ... L.R.A. 205; Ragan v. Kelly, 180 Md. 324, 24 A.2d ... 289; Bradford v. Eutaw Sav. Bank, Md., 46 A.2d 284 ... The record shows that according to the first account ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT