Ragan v. State
| Decision Date | 30 June 1916 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 430 |
| Citation | Ragan v. State, 15 Ala.App. 694, 72 So. 506 (Ala. App. 1916) |
| Parties | RAGAN v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cherokee County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.
Lee Ragan was prosecuted for grand larcency.From a judgment, he appeals.Affirmed.
George D. Motley, of Gadsden, for appellant.
William L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and Harwell G. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The indictment follows the form prescribed by the statute(Code 1907, § 7161, form 64), and was sufficient to support the judgment of the court.Carl v. State,125 Ala. 89, 29 So. 505.
This disposes of the only question presented on the appeal.The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Waldon v. State, 7 Div. 799
...Ex parte Chambers, 364 So.2d 420 (Ala.1978). An indictment for grand larceny in code form satisfies this requirement. Ragan v. State, 15 Ala.App. 694, 72 So. 506 (1916). In the charge involving the grand larceny of property from the Athens Outlet Company, the defendant had been placed on tr......
- State v. Fuller