Railroad Commission v. Galveston Chamber of Commerce
Decision Date | 03 April 1912 |
Citation | 145 S.W. 573 |
Parties | RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al. v. GALVESTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by the Galveston Chamber of Commerce and others against the Railroad Commission of Texas and others.From a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals(137 S. W. 737), reversing a judgment for defendants and rendering judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.Reversed, and judgment of district court affirmed.
Andrews, Ball & Streetman, of Houston, Baker, Botts, Parker & Garwood, of Houston, Gregory, Batts & Brooks, of Austin, Williams & Stedman, of Austin, J. P. Lightfoot, Atty. Gen., and J. D. Walthall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiffs in error.Yancy Lewis and Nelson Phillips, both of Dallas, for defendants in error.
This action was instituted by the Galveston Chamber of Commerce and some citizens against the Railroad Commission of Texas under the following articles of the Revised Statutes:
No questions arise upon the pleadings; they were appropriate and sufficient on both sides.
The case was tried in Travis county before the Honorable Chas. A. Wilcox, district judge, without a jury.The judge made a comprehensive and very clear statement of the facts found, upon which he entered judgment for the Commission, from which an appeal was taken by the plaintiffs to the Court of Civil Appeals of the Third District, which reversed the judgment of the district court and rendered judgment for the plaintiffs, Chamber of Commerce and others, enjoining the enforcement of the tariffs, orders, and regulations complained of.The Honorable C. H. Jenkins delivered the opinion of the court, filing a finding of facts which is a condensation of the more elaborate statement by the trial judge.No objection has been made to the findings of either court.We believe that a better comprehension of the case can be had from the statement of the trial court in connection with that of the Court of Civil Appeals; therefore from both statements we restate the case, as follows:
Galveston is situated on an island, and has a population of 37,000.It has deep water, and the largest sea-going vessels enter its harbor, making its commerce, domestic and foreign, of imports and exports extensive and important.In the city are firms doing large and lucrative business in various lines, among others, cotton factors, who buy cotton and ship it to other markets reached by the seas.Seven railroads enter Galveston from the mainland of Texas, two of which do not pass through Houston, to wit, the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé and the Gulf & Interstate.From Houston, the following railroads reach Galveston: International & Great Northern Railroad; the Galveston, Houston & Henderson Railroad; the Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railroad; the Trinity & Brazos Valley Railroad.The Gulf & Interstate Railroad is owned by the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railroad Company.Houston is reached by these railroads: Texas & New Orleans from the east; Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western from the east; Houston, East & West Texas from the northeast; Houston & Texas Central, International & Great Northern, Trinity & Brazos Valley and Missouri, Kansas & Texas from the north; Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio from the west; San Antonio & Aransas Pass from the west; Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company from the southwest over its branch from Alvin; St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico, operating its trains over the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé tracks, and the Galveston, Houston & Henderson, operating from Houston to Galveston.
We copy the following conclusions of fact filed by the trial judge:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
State v. Lone Star Gas Co.
...the Commission. Shupee v. Railroad Com., 123 Tex. 521, 73 S.W.2d 505, affirmed Tex. Civ.App., 57 S.W.2d 295; Railroad Com. v. Galveston C. of C., 105 Tex. 101, 145 S.W. 573; Railroad Com. v. Rau, Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W.2d 413; Railroad Com. v. Lamb, Tex.Civ.App., 81 S.W.2d 161; Humble Oil & R......
-
State v. Lone Star Gas Co.
...County Gas Co. v. McCall, 245 U. S. [345], loc. cit. 347, 38 S. Ct. 122, 62 L. Ed. 337." In the case of R. R. Commission v. Galveston C. of C., 105 Tex. 101, 145 S. W. 573, 580, which construed the similar statutes authorizing appeals from railroad rates fixed by the commission, and the sta......
-
Lone Star Gas Co. v. State, 7664.
...leaves no reasonable doubt in the judicial mind that the rate or rule is unjust and unreasonable.' Railroad Com. v. Galveston Chamber of Commerce, 105 Tex. 101, 145 S.W. 573, 580; Railroad Comm. v. Weld & Neville, 96 Tex. 394, 409, 73 S.W. 529. In advance of any actual tests of the practica......
-
Railroad Commission v. Houston Natural Gas Corp.
...by the Commission in fixing its rates, nor the motives or purposes which prompted such action.' Railroad Commission v. Galveston Chamber of Commerce, 105 Tex. 101, 145 S.W. 573, 580. The Commission may have used altogether erroneous methods and an erroneous conception of the law but if it a......